How to Deal With Mismatched Libidos...

How to Deal With Mismatched Libidos

Watch: Figs O’Sullivan, LMFT explains this.

To navigate mismatched desires, stop negotiating how often and start working on what the gap means to each of you. In almost every couple I see, a libido mismatch is a connection problem showing up in the bedroom: one partner reaches because sex is where they feel chosen, and the other pulls back because every reach feels like a test they are about to fail.

Desire in a long relationship is usually responsive, so it comes back when both bodies feel safe again. That means less pressure, more touch with no agenda, and one honest conversation about what has been in the way.

If you want help finding the first words for that conversation, Figlet is an AI coach that is there at 2 in the morning, or right now.

It happens in the dark. You reach for them, or they reach for you, and something in the air stiffens. A shoulder turns. A body goes rigid under the sheets. A polite “I’m just tired” lands with the weight of a verdict. In the space of two seconds, the person you sleep next to every night is on the other side of an ocean, and you are lying awake staring at the ceiling wondering when the two of you became this.

If you are the one who reached, the rejection lives in your chest for hours. You run the tape backward. Was it something I said at dinner? Do I disgust them now? Is this what the rest of my life looks like? If you are the one who turned, you feel the pressure of their disappointment settle onto your ribs like a wet coat. You want to disappear. You want them to stop needing something from you that your body cannot manufacture on command. You feel like you are failing at the most basic thing a partner is supposed to do.

Both of you are alone. Both of you are ashamed. Both of you are Googling in secret, hoping some article will tell you which of you is broken.

I want to slow you down. I have been a couples therapist for seventeen years, and mismatched libidos are one of the most common things I see in my office. They are also one of the most misunderstood. Almost every piece of advice you have already read is going to make this worse, because it treats what you have as a sex problem. What you actually have, in almost every case I have ever worked with, is a connection problem that is showing up in the bedroom.

This article is going to give you the clinical truth underneath that. Not tips. Not scheduling advice. A way of seeing what is actually happening between you.

Stop Fighting About Frequency

The Empathi Quiz

Which pattern is running your relationship?

Take the free three minute quiz and meet the creature behind the cycle you keep getting stuck in.

Take the quiz

The first thing I do with couples in this pain is stop the negotiation. If you have been trying to solve this by talking about numbers, twice a week, once a week, is that enough, is that too much, you have already lost. Negotiating frequency turns intimacy into a transaction, and the human nervous system does not get aroused by transactions.

The question I ask instead is not how often do you want sex. It is: how safe do you feel being vulnerable with this person right now? Because for most people in a long-term relationship, especially the partner with the lower drive, desire is responsive. It is not a drive that starts in you and hunts for a target. It is a response to safety, to feeling wanted as a whole person, to a nervous system that is settled enough to open. When the emotional bond between two people gets thin or strained, one or both partners will often find that desire just quietly walks out the door.

That is the piece nobody tells you. What looks like a libido mismatch is almost always one person who has unconsciously shut down desire as self-protection, and another person who is chasing more sex because sex has become the only place they still feel chosen. Both of you are reaching for connection. You are just doing it in opposite directions, and it is producing a standoff that neither of you can win.

From Empathi’s own research: in 58,221 completed relationship assessments, 74.1% of the 6,159 couples where both partners completed were in the pursue-withdraw cycle. Both partners typically describe the other as the one withdrawing.

See the full findings from 58,221 assessments

Spontaneous Desire, Responsive Desire, and Why the Gap Is So Common

Part of what makes a libido mismatch feel so personal is a story the culture sold us about how desire is supposed to work. In the movies, desire shows up out of nowhere, two people lock eyes, and the clothes come off. That does happen. It is just not how desire works for most bodies in a long relationship.

Emily Nagoski and others have shown that desire runs in two modes. Spontaneous desire seems to appear out of nowhere. Responsive desire emerges in response to closeness and arousal, not before it. Responsive desire is far more common than most people realize, especially in long-term relationships. So if one of you is waiting to feel like it before anything happens, you may be waiting for a kind of desire that body was never going to deliver on its own.

That changes the whole picture. The partner with spontaneous desire is not oversexed, and the partner with responsive desire is not broken. Desire is the wanting. Arousal is the body’s response. For a lot of long-term partners, especially the Reluctant Lover, arousal has to be invited in, gently, and then desire follows. If you are waiting for the “in the mood” desire that worked at twenty-five, you will wait a long time, because that is not how bonded, tired, forty-year-old bodies work.

It also helps to know there is no normal number, and I would be wary of anyone who sells you one. I have worked with couples who have sex once a month and feel deeply connected, and couples who have sex weekly and feel desperately alone. The number matters far less than the weight it carries.

The Two Questions Underneath Every Bedroom Fight

I tell couples there are really only two questions your nervous system is ever asking your partner. It does not matter whether you are fighting about sex, the dishes, the in-laws, or the tone of a text. Underneath every argument, one of these is running.

Are you there for me?

Am I enough for you?

That is attachment theory in its plainest possible language. In adult love, partners function as one another’s primary regulators. Your brain treats the person next to you the way a small child’s brain treats a parent. When the bond feels shaky, your amygdala fires before your thinking brain gets a vote. Cortisol floods. Logic goes offline. The rational part of you that could have a calm conversation about desire is nowhere to be found.

So when your partner turns away from you in bed, your body does not process that as “my partner is tired.” Your body hears an answer to one of those two questions. Am I a priority? No. Am I enough for you? No. That is why the pain is so disproportionate to the event. You are not reacting to tonight. You are reacting to every no your body has ever collected.

The Relentless Lover and the Reluctant Lover

In my practice, I call the partner reaching for more sex the Relentless Lover. Their core wound tends to be abandonment. When the bond feels uncertain, their body protests for closeness. For a lot of Relentless Lovers, sex is where they feel most sure the connection is intact. When their partner rejects a physical bid, it does not just feel like a physical no. It registers as evidence they are not a priority, that they are unwanted, that the person they love the most is drifting away.

So they reach again. They complain. They get an edge in their voice. They bring it up over breakfast, over text, over the third glass of wine on a Friday. This is not neediness. This is fear of abandonment living inside the body.

The other partner, the one with the lower drive, I call the Reluctant Lover. Their core wound is closer to rejection. The question haunting them is: am I enough? When the Relentless Lover pursues them, especially with even a trace of complaint or pressure underneath the bid, the Reluctant Lover’s nervous system does not hear “my partner wants me.” It hears “I am failing them again.” The answer to am I enough has arrived, and it is a no.

The pain of that no is unbearable. So they do the only thing their nervous system knows how to do. They shut down. They go quiet. They rationalize. They find a reason to stay up later than the reacher, to fall asleep before the reacher comes to bed, to be too tired, too stressed, too something. Their lack of desire in that moment is not coldness. It is not arrogance. It is the collapse of a person who feels sentenced to a lifetime of not being enough for the person they love most.

This is the piece Relentless Lovers almost never see. The partner you think does not care is often sitting in the next room drowning in how much they care and how badly they think they are failing you.

The Waltz of Pain in the Bedroom

When these two survival strategies collide, you get what I call the Waltz of Pain. A choreography neither of you chose but both of you now know by heart.

You reach. They retreat. You reach harder, because the retreat confirms your worst fear. They retreat deeper, because your harder reach confirms theirs. You escalate the protest, because protest feels like the last thread of the bond. They collapse further inside themselves, because collapse is the only place shame cannot follow them. Both of you are trying to survive the same threat. Neither of you can see it. Round and round it goes.

Seven or eight out of every ten couples I work with are dancing some version of this. It is not pathology. It is what happens when two nervous systems trying to protect themselves meet each other in the dark. But in the bedroom, this dance has a particularly cruel signature. Sex, which is supposed to be one of the primary places you feel safe with each other, becomes the arena where the wound gets touched most reliably. Every bid becomes a test. Every no becomes a verdict. Every yes given out of guilt or pressure builds a low-grade resentment that shows up three weeks later as another quiet no.

If this is landing, I have written more about the underlying loop in how to fix a broken relationship. The dance in the bedroom is the same dance you are probably doing in the kitchen, just with higher stakes and less clothing.

The Third Party That Is Not a Person

There is another thing I need to name, because it lives quietly underneath a lot of libido mismatches and almost no one talks about it.

In my office I use the term Third Party to describe anything a partner turns to for soothing, aliveness, or self-regulation instead of turning to their spouse. It does not have to be another person. It is often a phone. Overwork. Alcohol. Weed at the end of the day. Netflix on autopilot. Porn. The gym as an escape rather than a practice. Even the kids, when they become the emotional center of gravity that displaces the couple.

Third Parties are not always affairs. Most of them are not. But they send the same biological message to your partner: you are not my primary source of soothing. Something else is. And they are almost always sitting somewhere in a mismatched-libido dynamic, quietly draining the tank.

If one of you is coming to bed at midnight after two hours on a phone, and the other one has been lying there feeling less and less like a person for the last ninety minutes, the libido problem is downstream of the Third Party. The desire you are looking for cannot compete with a slot machine in your partner’s hand.

What the Higher Desire Partner Is Actually Hungry For

If you are the Relentless Lover in this dynamic, I want to ask you something that might sting. What are you actually hungry for?

Sometimes it is sex. Sex is a real need. I am not going to pretend otherwise. But when I sit down with pursuers in my office and slow them all the way down, what comes up under the frustration is almost never just sex. It is closeness. It is validation. It is a felt sense that their partner chooses them, still, on purpose, when there are a hundred other things they could be doing. It is the reassurance that they are wanted, not just tolerated.

When you can say “I miss you” instead of “you never want me,” something changes in the room. The first sentence invites your partner in. The second one puts them on trial. Your body knows the difference. Their body knows the difference. Even if the words are close, the nervous system reads them completely differently.

Ready to work on this?

Figlet is AI relationship coaching grounded in attachment science and Figs O’Sullivan’s clinical work, LMFT. First messages free, no signup.

Start working on this with Figlet →

What the Lower Desire Partner Is Actually Carrying

If you are the Reluctant Lover, I want you to know something too. Your low desire is not the problem your partner thinks it is. And it is not the personal failure you fear it is either.

There is almost always something underneath low desire that deserves to be understood rather than pushed through. Stress your partner has never fully seen. Resentment you have never let yourself say out loud. A history, sometimes stretching back to childhood, of your emotional needs being dismissed while your body was still expected to perform. Exhaustion so deep it has flattened every appetite you have. A sense of feeling unseen as a whole person, so that when your partner reaches for your body it feels like being reached for as an object rather than a self.

If you want to understand more of how these older patterns get into the bedroom, I have written about it in unresolved childhood trauma in relationships. The nervous system does not forget. And the body will use whatever protection it has, including going quiet in bed, to keep you safe from a repeat of an old injury.

Your job here is not to manufacture desire on command. Your job is to get honest with yourself about what has been building underneath. What have you not said? What have you been swallowing? Where in your body have you gone missing?

What Causes Mismatched Libidos?

When couples ask me what causes a libido mismatch, they usually want one answer. There are usually three layers, and it helps to check all of them.

The body

Sometimes the body piece is real. Hormonal shifts, postpartum recovery, perimenopause, medication side effects, depression, pain during sex, erection difficulties and unhealed sexual trauma all matter. Exhaustion matters too. If desire changed suddenly, or sex hurts, talk to your doctor first, because bodies are bodies. But even when the physical piece is real, the relational field around it either helps a person move through it or locks them further in.

The Representative left the bedroom

When you first met, you both sent your Representatives into the bedroom. That is what I call the polished version of you, the one who shows up on a first date already dressed for the part. Playful, confident, effortless. Their Representative met yours, and the room caught fire. The Representative is brilliant at recruitment. It cannot carry a marriage.

Then you built a life. You paid mortgages, maybe raised kids, watched each other be sick and tired and small. The uncertainty that felt like electricity got buried under the safety of knowing each other completely. Now it is not your sexy self walking into the bedroom. It is your vulnerable self, your tired self, the self that is secretly wondering whether you are still desirable. If you have not made room for those vulnerable selves anywhere else in the house, the bedroom becomes the last place either of you will risk being seen. This is why the lingerie does not work. Lingerie is a Representative solution to a vulnerable self problem.

The somatic ledger

Your body keeps what I call a somatic ledger, a running record of every moment reaching cost you and every moment reaching was met. Every apology that never came. Every night you swallowed something to keep the peace. When couples paper over hard conflict, they are printing relational debt. In the bedroom, that looks like having sex because that is what married couples do, or performing arousal you do not feel because the alternative is a conversation you are too tired to have. Eventually the body refuses to print any more fake currency, and desire shuts down as an act of self-preservation. The refusal is the wisdom.

For a lot of the people I sit with, there is one more piece. One partner has become the household manager and lost the lover. They track the dentist appointments, the school forms, the birthday presents, the in-law moods. By the time a hand reaches for them at eleven at night, they are not being reached for as a lover. They are being reached for as one more thing on the list.

How to Talk About Mismatched Libidos Without It Becoming a Fight

Most advice on this tells you to pick a neutral time, use “I” statements, and bring a list of what you want. The tool is not exactly wrong. The timing and the target are. When you sit your partner down and open with anything about sex, however lovingly worded, their body does not process a request. It processes a verdict. So the real question is not how to say it better. It is how to make the conversation survivable for both of you.

Here is the sequence I use with couples.

  1. Settle your body first. If your chest is tight and you are rehearsing your case, you are not ready. Put your feet on the floor, slow your breath, and wait until you can talk without building a prosecution.
  2. Talk about the conversation before the content. Something like: “I want to talk about something that has been hard, and I notice I am scared to even open my mouth. I imagine you might be scared too. Can we go slow?”
  3. Lead with the ache, not the ask. Leading with what you want makes your partner hear what they have failed to provide. Lead with the fear underneath the want instead. Your partner can climb through a window. They cannot climb through a demand.
  4. Expect their activation to spike, and do not treat it as evidence. A flat face or a defensive sentence is not the end of the conversation. It is the beginning. Soften your voice and say, “I can see this is hard. I am not building a case. I just want us to find our way back.”
  5. Plan on a hundred small conversations, not one big one. Every time you touch the topic and both of you survive it, the body learns that this room does not have to end in shame.

If you are the one who wants more

Stop telling the story of what they will not do, and tell the experience of what it is like inside you. Not “you never want me.” Not “it has been three months.” Those are prosecution. Instead, something like: “When we do not touch, my chest goes tight and I feel completely alone. I miss you. And I am scared we are losing each other.” No but. No “so can we.” You are not asking for anything. You are showing your partner the frightened animal under the score keeping, and that animal is the one thing they have not seen, because all they have seen is the pressure.

If you are the one who wants less

You do not have to have sex you do not want. You do have to see the broken bone in your partner’s chest. Replace “I’m just tired,” which tells them nothing and leaves them to fill the gap with their worst fear, with something true: “I want to want you, and something has been in the way. It is not that I do not love you. I am pulling back because I feel overwhelmed and terrified of failing you.” Say that once and watch what happens to the room.

I go much deeper on the words themselves in how to talk about sex with your partner. And if every attempt already turns into a shouting match, start with what is really happening when you fight about your sex life.

How to Compromise When Your Libidos Do Not Match

Compromise is the word everyone reaches for, and I understand why. But if compromise means the higher desire partner gets sex twice a week and the lower desire partner grits their teeth through it, nobody wins. The reaching partner still feels unwanted, because the sex is happening from obligation instead of desire. And every yes given out of guilt builds the low-grade resentment I described above. Nobody owes anybody sex.

The compromise that actually works is on the conditions, not the count.

Touch that goes nowhere

In a lot of couples with a libido mismatch, every touch has become a request. A hand on the hip at the kitchen sink is not affection anymore. It is the opening move of a negotiation, and the lower desire partner’s body braces for it. So they stop being touched at all, and the higher desire partner gets hungrier. You have to teach both bodies that touch does not automatically lead to pressure or rejection. A hand on the back of the neck without an agenda. Eye contact. A long hug that ends as a hug. Desire does not come back through the front door. It comes back once the alarm is off.

Scheduled contact, not scheduled sex

Some couples I work with protect twenty minutes on the couch with no phones, a weekly practice of holding each other with no expectation that it leads anywhere. Inside that slot, the body has permission to open or not. That is not unromantic. That is proof of work.

I know this one from my own marriage. My wife and I met at Esalen. Hot springs, dancing, a fiery connection that required no effort at all. Then we moved into real life, with kids and businesses, and that spontaneous desire faded the way it does for nearly everyone. We had our own agonizing conversations, where she told me she felt lonely being the one to initiate, and I had to confess how terrified I was of being a disappointment. My sexy persona had collapsed. What was left was two scared, not very confident people who had to learn how to make love as exactly that. What worked was scheduling. Not the sex. The showing up. A fixed time where we put down our Representatives, turned off the phones, and met each other without needing lightning or a flawless performance. It was the least sexy idea I have ever had, and it saved us.

Widen what counts as intimacy

If the only thing that counts is intercourse, the higher desire partner keeps score on one number and the lower desire partner keeps failing one test. When couples do this work, the daytime connection returns first. The touch on the shoulder. The look across the kitchen. The moment of being seen while you are loading the dishwasher. Sex tends to come back last, quietly, when both bodies have decided each other is safe again.

When “Mismatched Libidos” Is Actually a Symptom of Something Bigger

I want to be honest with you about one more thing. Sometimes what looks like mismatched libidos is a symptom of a relationship that has genuine trouble underneath, not just the ordinary Waltz. Sometimes there has been a betrayal that never got repaired. Sometimes there has been years of low-grade contempt that has slowly rewired how you see each other. Sometimes one partner is in a coercive dynamic and the body has correctly refused to perform in a place where it is not safe.

If you are wondering whether what you are in is a normal painful loop or something more serious, this diagnostic framework for toxic relationships is a good place to slow down and check. Most couples I meet who fear they are in something toxic are actually in a very loud, very painful, very fixable version of the ordinary bad basket. But you need to know which one you are in before you can figure out what the desire piece is really telling you.

Should You Break Up Over Mismatched Libidos?

Usually not, and almost never as a first move. Most couples I see who have not had sex in months still love each other desperately. What they have lost is not love. It is the felt sense of safety that has to be present for sex to happen. In seventeen years of practice I have seen many couples with years of no sex come back to real intimacy.

What I watch for is not the size of the gap. It is willingness. Dead bedrooms are recoverable. Dead willingness is not. If both of you are still asking the question, still willing to look at the loop instead of at each other’s flaws, the bond is still alive.

I also watch for escape routes. I once worked with a couple who came in saying they needed help navigating their open relationship. When I saw them individually, the truth came out: they had not touched each other in seven years. The open relationship was not a philosophy. It was an escape route from a pattern neither of them could face. Before you decide the mismatch means you are simply incompatible, make sure you are not building an exit from a conversation you have never actually had.

And one line I hold firmly. If there is pressure, guilt, punishment or any force around sex, that is not a libido mismatch and it is not a dance. Please talk to a professional, and if you are afraid of your partner, call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-7233. If the two of you have gone months or years without sex and the bed has become a no man’s land, start with what to do in a sexless marriage.

The Real Shift

Here is what I want you to walk away with. If you take one thing from this whole article, take this.

Stop trying to solve the sex problem. There is no sex problem to solve. There is a bond that has gone thin, two nervous systems that have started to armor against each other, and a Waltz that has taught your bodies to associate the bedroom with failure. Fix the bond, and desire returns. Not on a schedule. Not to some predetermined frequency. But it returns, because desire is what living tissue does when it feels safe.

That fix looks like the Relentless Lover learning to say “I miss you” instead of “you never want me.” It looks like the Reluctant Lover learning to say “I want to want you, and here is what has been in the way” instead of “I’m just tired.” It looks like both of you turning your attention to the Third Parties that have been eating your evenings. It looks like getting curious about each other again, on the same team, working on a shared problem, rather than positioned across a courtroom arguing about frequency.

This is not a you problem or a them problem

“Round and round they go. Escalating judgments. Reaffirming worst fears. Two people throwing emotional boomerangs, doing exactly what makes logical sense to survive their own pain, only to gut their partner and ensure their own continued suffering. The way you try to get out of feeling hurt and threatened usually hurts and threatens your partner.”

“The fight is never about the content. It is always about the bond.”

Figs O’Sullivan, LMFT

What to Do Tonight

  1. Do not bring it up in bed. Not while either of you is lit up. Pick an hour when you are both fed and neither of you is on your phone, even if that hour is tomorrow.
  2. Leave the phone in another room for the last hour of the night. If a Third Party has been eating your evenings, tonight it does not come to bed with you.
  3. Say one sentence, and only one. If you want more: “I miss you, and I am scared we are losing each other.” If you want less: “I want to want you, and something has been in the way.” Then stop.
  4. Touch with no agenda. A hand on their back or arm that goes nowhere. Let it end as touch.
  5. Name the loop, not the person. Something like: “I think we are both scared because we matter so much to each other.” The enemy is the dance, not your partner.

Common Questions

Why has my partner suddenly lost interest in sex?

Sudden shifts in desire are almost always downstream of a shift in emotional safety, a life stressor, a health issue, or something that has been building quietly for months and finally hit a threshold. Before you personalize it, get curious. Ask what has felt hard lately. What have they been carrying? Sudden low desire is a signal, not a verdict on you.

Is it normal for one partner to want sex more than the other?

Yes, and it is close to universal. Most long-term couples have some degree of mismatch, and the mismatch itself is not the problem. The problem is what the two of you do with it. Couples who treat the gap as a shared puzzle stay connected. Couples who treat it as a fight over frequency or a referendum on love slide into the Waltz and stay stuck.

Can a marriage survive a long-term libido mismatch?

Yes, and I have watched it happen many times. The couples who make it are the ones who stop grading each other on frequency and start rebuilding the emotional bond that responsive desire actually needs. They tend to the underlying loop, address the Third Parties, and treat sex as one expression of connection rather than the scoreboard for it. The marriage does not survive by matching numbers. It survives by getting honest.

Should we try scheduling sex?

Scheduling can help some couples create a container that removes the pressure of spontaneous initiation, especially when kids and work have flattened everything. But it will not fix a mismatch that is really about disconnection. If you schedule sex without repairing the emotional loop underneath, you are just putting a calendar on top of a wound. Do the bond work first.

When should we see a couples therapist about this?

When the two of you can no longer talk about it without one or both of you shutting down, escalating, or leaving the room. When resentment has built to the point that even good moments feel booby-trapped. When one of you has started to wonder whether the relationship is going to survive. A skilled therapist does not fix your sex life. They help you see the Waltz you have been dancing so you can stop dancing it.

What causes mismatched libidos?

Usually a mix of body, history and bond. Hormones, medication, postpartum recovery, perimenopause, depression, pain and exhaustion all matter, and a sudden change is worth a conversation with your doctor. But in most couples I see, the bigger driver is relational: a pursue-withdraw loop, unspoken resentment, or a Third Party that has been quietly draining the tank.

How do you compromise with mismatched libidos?

Compromise on the conditions, not the count. Trading a number of times per week usually leaves the higher desire partner still feeling unwanted and the lower desire partner feeling used. What works better is touch with no agenda, protected time together with no phones, and honest conversations about what has been in the way, so responsive desire has a warm room to answer in.

Should you break up over mismatched libidos?

Rarely, and not before you have looked at the loop underneath. Dead bedrooms are recoverable. Dead willingness is not. If one of you refuses to look at the pattern at all, or if there is any pressure or force around sex, that is a different conversation, and a couples therapist can help you see it clearly.

How do I talk to my partner about different sex drives?

Outside the bedroom, with your body settled, and by leading with the ache instead of the ask. “I miss you and I am scared we are losing each other” lands very differently than “you never want me.” Expect the first conversation to be hard, and treat it as the first of many rather than the one that has to fix everything.

What is a normal sex drive in a relationship?

There is no normal number, and I would be wary of anyone who sells you one. Some couples have sex once a month and feel deeply connected, and some have sex weekly and feel desperately alone. What matters is whether the two of you can talk about what sex means to each of you.

Do not just close the tab on this.

Bring what surfaced here into a real conversation about what is actually happening in your bedroom. Figlet coaches you through it, grounded in Figs O’Sullivan’s work, LMFT. Free to start.

Start with Figlet now →

The bedroom is not where this gets solved. The bedroom is where it shows up. Go find the bond underneath it. That is the work.

The Empathi Quiz

Every couple has a pattern they cannot see. Find yours.

In love, each of you is a Relentless or a Reluctant, which makes you one of three kinds of couple: Relentless and Reluctant, two Relentless, or two Reluctant. The free quiz reveals your creatures and the cycle they fall into together. About three minutes.

About three minutesCompletely freeBuilt on EFT science
Take the Empathi quiz

No signup needed to start.

The Relentless

The Reluctant

Which one are you?
Share this article

Figs O'Sullivan is a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist (LMFT #79062) and the founder of Empathi. For 17 years he has helped couples move out of disconnection and back into secure, loving connection, drawing on Emotionally Focused Therapy and attachment science. With his wife Teale, he runs a San Francisco couples therapy practice, is a relationship expert to the Stars and Silicon Valley, and built Figlet, an AI relationship coach trained on their clinical work. His approach has guided more than 58,000 relationship assessments.

Related Articles

Scroll to Top
Share "How to Deal With Mismatched Libidos"
Reading this from the Bay Area? Figs and Teale see couples in person at 999 Sutter Street in San Francisco, and online across California. Free 30-minute consult
Man smiling and meditating in a therapy session setting.
Figs, Teale & Figlet
● Available 24/7
You’re not alone.
Neither is your relationship. Talk to us right now, any time.
Start coaching with Figlet
First 10 messages free. No credit card required.
Request a Free Consultation
Figlet is Figs in an AI bottle
Not sure where to start? Take the 3-minute quiz ›
Man smiling and meditating in a therapy session setting.
Ask Figlet AI
Empathi couple illustration

Before you go: curious about your relationship pattern?

Take a free 3-minute quiz and discover whether you tend to pursue or withdraw in conflict. You'll get a personalized report.

Take the Free Quiz → 13 questions • 100% free • No email required
Couples therapy session with Figs O'Sullivan, focusing on relationship counseling.

Learn the method that transforms relationships

Join the Empathi Method Masterclass, a self-paced online course built on attachment science by Figs & Teale O'Sullivan.

Explore the Masterclass → Self-paced • Science-backed • Start today
Empathi couple illustration Couples therapy session with Figs O'Sullivan, focusing on relationship counseling.

Get relationship insights in your inbox

Join our newsletter for science-backed tips on connection, conflict, and lasting love.

Free • No spam • Unsubscribe anytime

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does one partner always want sex more than the other?+
This isn't actually about biology or hormones like most people think. What you're seeing is usually the Waltz of Pain playing out in the bedroom. One partner (often the Relentless Lover) pursues sexual connection as a way to feel safe and wanted, while the other (the Reluctant Lover) withdraws because they don't feel emotionally safe enough to be that vulnerable. The fight isn't about what you think it's about. It's about two nervous systems trying to protect themselves in different ways. The pursuer needs connection to feel secure, the withdrawer needs emotional safety before they can open up physically.
How do you fix mismatched sex drives in a relationship?+
You don't fix the sex drives, you fix the emotional connection. Desire is responsive, it responds to safety. When couples get caught in the Versus Illusion, treating each other like the enemy instead of addressing the pattern, the bedroom becomes another battlefield. I work with couples to create what I call the Missing Experience, where both partners feel truly seen and wanted as whole people, not just bodies. This takes time and what I call proof-of-work empathy, real emotional repair, not just quick fixes or scheduling more sex.
Is it normal to lose sexual desire in long-term relationships?+
Completely normal, and usually fixable. What happens is that life stress, unrepaired hurts, and emotional distance slowly drain the safety from a relationship. When your nervous system doesn't feel secure with your partner, desire quietly walks out the door. This isn't about getting older or being broken. It's about two people who stopped feeling truly wanted by each other. The good news is that desire can absolutely come back when the emotional foundation gets rebuilt. If you need help figuring out where to start, Figlet, our AI relationship coach, can help you identify what's really going on underneath the surface.