You love this person. You also cannot keep doing this.
That is the sentence underneath the search. You typed “attachment styles toxic” at eleven at night because something in you needs a name for what is happening between you. You have read enough by now to have a working theory. You are anxious, they are avoidant. Or you are avoidant, they are anxious. Or you are both disorganized and the whole thing is a torture chamber. You have a diagnosis for your partner. They probably have one for you. And still, nothing changes. You keep having the same fight. You keep ending up on the floor of the same room in your own body.
I want to slow you down before you go read another listicle that flattens all of this into “leave the avoidant” or “heal your anxious wiring.”
I have been a couples therapist for over seventeen years. I have sat with thousands of couples who walked in convinced their attachment styles made them toxic. And here is what I need you to hear first, because the rest of the article will not land otherwise. Your relationship is probably not toxic because of your styles. Your relationship is painful because two nervous systems that love each other have gotten caught in a loop with no exit, and the internet has handed you a set of labels that make the loop worse instead of better.
That is a different problem. And it has a different answer.
Recognize yourself in this loop?
Talk to Figlet about the pattern you and your partner keep repeating. AI relationship coaching grounded in Figs O’Sullivan’s work, LMFT. Free to start, no credit card.
What “Toxic” Actually Means Inside the Nervous System
Which pattern is running your relationship?
Take the free three minute quiz and meet the creature behind the cycle you keep getting stuck in.
The word toxic has been so overused it has almost stopped meaning anything. Your coworker calls her boyfriend toxic because he did not text back for three hours. TikTok therapists call any conflict toxic. Meanwhile someone in a genuinely dangerous situation quietly decides their experience must not count, because the word has been diluted past recognition.
So let me tell you what I actually think toxic means, clinically, after all these years in the room.
Toxic is when both people are getting hurt, and the way they each try to stop getting hurt makes the pain bigger. The reaching gets sharper. The distancing gets colder. Two bodies escalate off each other. The two of you get tied in knots and there is no way out. That is toxic. Not one villain and one victim. Two bonded systems in an escalating loop with no repair on the other side.
The real marker of a toxic relationship, in my experience, is not the intensity of the fight. It is the absence of repair afterward. Couples who fight hard and then come back to each other are not toxic. They are alive. The couples I worry about are the ones who disconnect for days, weeks, months, and never find their way back to the softness before the next fight starts.
If you love each other, distress is a feature, not a bug. Two people bonded tightly enough to matter will absolutely scare the living daylights out of each other. That is not evidence the relationship is doomed. That is evidence the bond is real.
What the data shows: in 58,221 completed relationship assessments, 58.4% came out as pursuers and 41.6% as withdrawers of the 53,495 people typed. Pursuers who collapse often look like withdrawers.
The Weaponization of Attachment Theory
Here is where I have to say something that is going to be uncomfortable for anyone who has spent months reading about their partner’s style.
Attachment theory is a beautiful body of work. John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth gave us a way of understanding humanity that is one of the most compassionate frames in all of psychology. And the internet has taken that gift and turned it into a weapon you now use against your partner and against yourself.
I see it every week. A couple comes into my office. One person has been reading everything about what it is like to be with a narcissistic partner. The other has been secretly reading about walking on eggshells with a borderline partner. They have arrived, both of them, with dueling diagnoses of the other person. I sit with them and I have to say the thing they do not want to hear.
Neither of you is mentally ill. Neither of you has a personality disorder. You are behaving normally and rationally when you are with someone who has started looking at you like you are a mental patient.
If you are diagnosing your partner as borderline, you are basically telling them they are too much. If you are calling them a narcissist, you are basically saying they are not enough. Too much. Not enough. These are not clinical observations. These are the oldest wounds in the human body dressed up in diagnostic language.
Attachment styles get used the same way. I am anxious. My partner is avoidant. The label becomes a weapon. The wisdom becomes a way of proving your partner cannot meet you and never will. What was supposed to be a way of understanding and loving humanity becomes another way to say: see, they are the problem, and I am the reasonable one.
The algorithm rewards this. When the bond feels shaky, a diagnosis offers a shot of certainty. It gives your pain a plot, complete with a bad guy. And once there is a bad guy, the next steps are obvious. Leave. Block. Cut off. Done.
But you did not build this dynamic alone. And no diagnosis of your partner, however satisfying, is going to change that.
The Two Lovers Underneath the Labels
I do not use the clinical labels in my office anymore. Not because they are wrong. Because they hide what is actually happening.
The person the world calls anxious, I call the Relentless Lover. When connection feels at risk, they reach. They protest. Their body is saying, please do not leave me, please see me, please let me matter. This is not neediness. This is the ancient biological fear of abandonment living inside a body that once learned, very young, that when the primary person was not there, dingoes were going to come.
The person the world calls avoidant, I call the Reluctant Lover. When things feel intense, they retreat. They protect through distance. Their body is saying, please do not see my flaws, please do not expose my not-enoughness, please do not reject me. This is not coldness. This is the ancient biological fear of shame and failure living inside a body that once learned that being seen fully meant being found lacking.
Two different wounds. Same longing. Both people are trying to secure love. Both people are terrified. And when they meet in a relationship, their protector parts collide. His protector meets her protector. Two childhood strategies grab the wheel, and the relationship becomes a reenactment of wounds neither partner caused.
Disorganized attachment, the pattern the internet loves to call the worst, is really just what happens when someone got hurt badly on both the abandonment side and the rejection side. They live inside a torture chamber where reaching for love feels like getting close to the fire either way. Not broken. Adaptively bracing.
I have written more about the Reluctant Lover pattern specifically in Avoidant Partner: How to Cope, if that side of the dynamic is where you keep landing.
The Loop You Are Actually In
Here is the loop, mechanically. This is what a fight in your kitchen actually is, underneath the content.
Something happens. He checks his phone at dinner. She sighs walking in the door. He is quiet on the drive home. She takes forty extra minutes to respond to a text. The event itself is small. What it lands on is not.
Your body reads the event before your thinking brain gets to weigh in. It writes a negative story about the other person. A secondary, reactive emotion fires. Anger. Contempt. Coldness. Panic. And then your protector part takes the action it has always taken. You reach harder. Or you go quiet. Or you cut. That is your one-two-three.
Your partner receives your protective action as an attack. Their physiology writes its own negative story. Their reactive emotion fires. Their protector takes its action. That is their one-two-three.
Now you are in it. Two people, each running their choreography, each move triggering the next move in the other. I call this the Waltz of Pain, and for those like me who grew up learning to waltz with a mop as a child, one-two-three, one-two-three, that is the tempo. And here is the thing. You are not waltzing on your own. It takes two people to waltz.
The couple keeps scaring the living daylights out of each other inside this waltz. And every time it happens, both people file more evidence that the other person is the problem. The Relentless Lover files evidence of abandonment. The Reluctant Lover files evidence of being too much. The wounds get louder. The moves get sharper. The pain gets bigger.
This is what toxic looks like from the inside. Not one bad person. A system in escalation.
If you want to name your own position in this pattern first, you can take the free Figs Quiz and see what your protective choreography actually is.
The Shift That Actually Changes Anything
Every couple I have ever helped move out of a painful loop had to make one single shift first. Everything else follows from it.
The shift is this. It is not you versus me. It is us versus the dynamic that is trying to kill our connection.
Read that again slowly. Because the entire toxic frame is built on you-versus-me. You are the anxious one. I am the avoidant one. You are too much. I am not enough. Your wiring is destroying us. Your reactivity is destroying us. Both partners standing on opposite sides of the ring, throwing evidence at each other about who the problem is.
The moment a couple can turn and see the cycle itself as the enemy, everything changes. His reaching is not the problem. Her distancing is not the problem. The loop between them is the problem. The system they made together, without meaning to, is the problem. And you cannot fight a system by attacking the other person inside it. You can only fight it together.
When one couple I worked with finally got this, the wife said something I will never forget. She said, oh. It has been us against each other for six years, and it was actually us against this thing the whole time.
That is the shift. From two adversaries to two teammates facing the same enemy.
Ready to stop fighting each other?
Figlet is AI relationship coaching grounded in attachment science and Figs O’Sullivan’s clinical work, LMFT. First messages free, no signup.
Empathy Cubed: The Actual Exit
One-way empathy will not save you. This is where most couples’ work stops short, and it is why so many couples leave therapy still trapped.
What has to happen is what I call Empathy Cubed. Three axes of compassion held at once. Empathy for me. Empathy for you. Empathy for the system between us. Three bodies being cared for at the same time. Mine. Yours. The waltz itself.
When only one partner has empathy, someone is always losing. When both partners have empathy for each other but not for the cycle, they keep getting sucked back into the loop the second either of them gets triggered. The cycle itself has to become an object of compassion. That is the thing that has to be met with softness, not sharpness.
Practically, here is how you get there. You catch yourself at the top of the reactive arc. Story of other running in your head. Protector part in full force. You notice you are doing it. That is the first curve. Then you go down to what is actually underneath. The primary emotion. The tender fear. The shame. The old longing for the bond that you did not want to feel. That is the bottom.
Then you come back up. But this time you speak the vulnerable truth instead of the protective one. Not “you never care about me,” but “I got scared you were leaving.” Not “you are so needy,” but “I felt like I was failing you again.” That curve back up, into vulnerability spoken out loud, is where the loop breaks.
When both of you can do that, the C becomes an O. A closed loop. A secure bond. Not a fantasy. An actual sovereign us.
Toxic Person or Toxic Dynamic
I want to be honest about one more thing before we close, because everything I have said so far assumes you are in a toxic dynamic, not with a toxic person. Those are two very different problems, and only one of them responds to the work I am describing.
A toxic dynamic is what two decent people create when their protector parts collide. Neither is the villain. The system is the problem. This is the vast majority of what walks into my office calling itself toxic. It is highly workable.
A toxic person is someone whose character or behavior makes them fundamentally unsafe to be in relationship with. Sustained cruelty. Coercive control. Physical violence. A complete refusal to ever take responsibility. Patterns of contempt so entrenched they have reshaped how the two of you see each other. That is different. That does not respond to Empathy Cubed. That requires exit.
I have written a longer diagnostic in Am I in a Toxic Relationship? that walks through the distinction more carefully. If reading this article you have a quiet certainty that you are the one always shrinking, always managing, always the one whose reality gets rewritten, please take that seriously. That is a different conversation than the one about styles.
The other pattern I want to name, because it hides underneath a lot of “toxic” self-diagnosis, is the private conviction that you are the reason. That me being me is not going to be enough. If that sentence lives in your body, Feeling Unworthy of Love and Affection in Relationships is the piece to read next.
The Real Usable Shift
If you take one thing from all this, take this.
Your style is not making your relationship toxic. Your style, and your partner’s style, is meeting in a loop that neither of you designed and neither of you can exit alone. The loop is the enemy. Not each other.
Stop building the case against your partner. Stop diagnosing them into a category that lets you feel righteous. Every diagnosis you hand your partner is a stone in the wall between you. The wall will still be there when you leave, and you will build it again with the next person, because you are the one carrying the stones.
Turn instead toward the cycle you both made. Name it out loud together. When it starts spinning, one of you says: there it is, we are in it again. Not “you are doing it again.” We are in it again. That small pronoun is the entire shift.
That is the work. Slow, unglamorous, deeply human. Not a diagnosis. A practice.
This is not a you problem or a them problem
“To step out of this cycle, couples must break the Versus Illusion and recognize the system itself as their common enemy. This is achieved when both partners accept the systemic truth: we are both hurting, we are both reacting, and it is only happening because we are so important to each other.”
“Neither partner is the villain. They are two younger selves inside adult bodies trying to stay safe in the only ways they once knew.”
Figs O’Sullivan, LMFT
Common Questions
Are certain attachment styles more toxic than others?
No style is toxic on its own. Anxious, avoidant, disorganized, secure, all of them are adaptive strategies a body developed to survive its early conditions. What creates toxicity is not the style itself but two styles colliding without the capacity for repair. A secure partner with an avoidant partner can build a beautiful life. Two anxious partners can too. The style is not the problem. The loop between them, and whether they can exit it, is.
Can two people with insecure attachment styles have a healthy relationship?
Yes, and most of the couples I have worked with over seventeen years fit this description. Two insecure reachers can absolutely build a secure bond together. What it requires is that both people are willing to see the cycle they create, take ownership of their own protective moves, and turn toward each other in the vulnerable place instead of hardening into the protective one. The security is not something you arrive with. It is something you build together, slowly, through repair.
Is my partner avoidant or actually just not into me?
This is the question anxious partners ask constantly, and I understand why. The honest answer is that avoidance almost never means not caring. In seventeen years I have not once sat with a withdrawing partner who was withdrawing because they did not care. They withdraw because they care so much that the possibility of failing you is unbearable. That said, if there is no repair, no reaching back, no interest in the loop itself, that is a different signal worth heeding.
How do I know if I should leave or if it is just my wiring talking?
The clearest question I ask couples at this threshold is whether repair is possible. Not whether you fight, but whether you can find your way back after. If both of you are willing to look at the cycle, name your protective parts, and turn toward each other in the vulnerable place, the relationship is workable, even when it feels awful. If one or both of you refuses to look at the system you co-created, that is a different picture. I go deeper into this in Relationship Red Flags: Which Ones Are Real.
Can attachment styles actually change over time?
Yes. This is not a fixed personality trait. It is a set of expectations learned in relationship, and it updates through relationship. A person who spent thirty years as a Relentless Lover can, over time, feel their body settle inside a bond that consistently answers their old questions with yes. The same is true for the Reluctant Lover. It does not happen through insight alone. It happens through hundreds of small moments where the old prediction gets contradicted by a new experience.
Do not just close the tab on this.
Bring what surfaced here into a real conversation. Figlet coaches you through the exact loop you and your partner keep repeating, grounded in Figs O’Sullivan’s work, LMFT. Free to start.
The label is not the work. The loop is the work. Go find the cycle before you go looking for the exit.
Keep Reading
Every couple has a pattern they cannot see. Find yours.
In love, each of you is a Relentless or a Reluctant, which makes you one of three kinds of couple: Relentless and Reluctant, two Relentless, or two Reluctant. The free quiz reveals your creatures and the cycle they fall into together. About three minutes.
No signup needed to start.
The Relentless
The Reluctant
