Red Flags When Dating: What Your Therapist Wishes You Knew Before You Fall
Which pattern is running your relationship?
Take the free three minute quiz and meet the creature behind the cycle you keep getting stuck in.
Let me tell you something that might sting a little. Most of the “red flags when dating” content you’ve consumed online is, at best, incomplete. At worst, it’s actively making you worse at choosing a partner.
I’ve been a licensed marriage and family therapist for over sixteen years. I’ve sat with thousands of couples, many of whom looked back at the early days of their relationship and said some version of the same thing: “The signs were all there. I just didn’t see them.”
But here’s the part nobody talks about. You didn’t miss the signs because you’re foolish. You missed them because your brain was running an entirely different operating system during those early months. And the person you were evaluating? They weren’t even fully showing up yet.
This article is not another listicle of “ten red flags when dating that mean you should run.” You can find those anywhere. Instead, I want to give you something more useful: a clinical framework for understanding why red flags are invisible early on, what’s actually being hidden from you (and from your partner), and how your own attachment wiring determines which warnings you’re biologically inclined to ignore.
The Representative: Who You’re Actually Dating in the First Six Months
There’s a concept I use constantly in my practice. I call it “the Representative.” When you first start dating someone, you’re not meeting them. You’re meeting their Representative.
The Representative is the version of your partner that shows up for the job interview. They’re polished. They’re charming. They’re attentive. They remember the little things. They text back promptly. They seem emotionally available, curious about your life, and refreshingly different from the last person who hurt you.
The Representative is not fake, exactly. It’s more like a highlight reel. Your partner genuinely possesses the qualities the Representative is displaying. The problem is that the Representative is also strategically omitting everything else. The anxiety. The avoidance. The way they shut down during conflict. The jealousy they haven’t dealt with. The relationship with their mother that bleeds into every romantic bond they form.
Here’s what makes this so tricky. Your partner isn’t doing this on purpose. The Representative is largely unconscious. It’s a survival strategy, refined over decades, designed to secure attachment. Your partner’s nervous system is running a program that says: “Be appealing. Be easy. Don’t scare them off.” And that program is remarkably effective.
The real person, the one you’ll eventually be in a relationship with, only emerges when the stakes get high enough to trigger their deeper patterns. As I often tell my clients: in calm weather, everyone looks securely attached.
Think of it like this. You’re hiring someone for the most important role in your life, and the candidate has complete control over the interview. They choose what to show you. They choose the lighting. They choose the questions. And your brain, flooded with feel-good chemicals, is sitting there nodding along, already drafting the offer letter.
This is not a process designed to reveal truth. It’s a process designed to secure attachment. And it works beautifully, which is precisely the problem.
When the Representative Starts to Crack
The Representative doesn’t retire all at once. It fades gradually, usually around the three-to-six-month mark, sometimes later. You’ll notice small inconsistencies first. They cancel plans they previously would have moved mountains to keep. They react to a minor disagreement with surprising intensity. They go quiet for a day and offer no explanation.
These aren’t necessarily red flags when dating. Sometimes they’re just signs that a real human being is starting to relax enough to be themselves. The question is whether what’s underneath the Representative is something you can work with, or something that will slowly erode your sense of safety.
Not sure where you stand?
Take the free Figs Quiz. 13 questions. Discover your relationship pattern in under 3 minutes.
Limerence: The Neurochemical Blindfold
If the Representative is what your partner is doing unconsciously, limerence is what your brain is doing to you.
Limerence is the state of intense, involuntary romantic obsession that marks the early phase of falling in love. It’s not just “butterflies.” It’s a full neurochemical event. Your brain floods with dopamine, norepinephrine, and phenylethylamine while simultaneously suppressing serotonin (the neurotransmitter responsible for rational, balanced thinking). It’s the same neurochemical profile seen in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Let that land for a moment. When you’re falling in love, your brain is literally operating in a state that mirrors OCD. You’re fixated, idealized, and profoundly impaired in your ability to evaluate risk.
This is why so many people look back on early relationships and say, “I can’t believe I didn’t see it.” You didn’t see it because your brain’s threat-detection system was being chemically suppressed. Limerence doesn’t just make you overlook red flags when dating. It actively reinterprets them as positives.
How Limerence Reframes Red Flags
Here’s what this looks like in practice:
They’re intensely jealous early on. Limerence tells you: “They just care so much. Nobody has ever wanted me this badly.” What’s actually happening: they’re displaying controlling behavior rooted in insecure attachment. Jealousy in the first few weeks, before any real bond has formed, is not passion. It’s a preview of how they manage anxiety.
They push for commitment extremely fast. Limerence tells you: “This must be real because they’re so certain about us.” What’s actually happening: rapid commitment-seeking (sometimes called “love bombing”) is often a strategy to lock down attachment before you’ve had a chance to evaluate the relationship clearly. A person who is genuinely secure can tolerate the uncertainty of getting to know someone gradually.
They share deep trauma very early. Limerence tells you: “They trust me. We have an incredible connection.” What’s actually happening: premature vulnerability can be a form of emotional flooding designed (unconsciously) to create a sense of intimacy that hasn’t been earned. Genuine intimacy is built slowly. When someone shares their deepest wounds on a second date, they may be using vulnerability as a bonding shortcut rather than engaging in the slower, less dramatic work of actually getting to know you.
They have no close friendships or all their exes are “crazy.” Limerence tells you: “They’ve just been misunderstood. I’m the one who finally gets them.” What’s actually happening: a consistent pattern of failed relationships and absent friendships is one of the most reliable predictors of how your relationship will eventually go. If everyone in their life has eventually become the enemy, the common denominator is not bad luck.
They mirror you perfectly. Limerence tells you: “We’re so compatible, it’s like they’re my twin.” What’s actually happening: some people are exceptionally skilled at reading what you want and reflecting it back. This isn’t connection. It’s performance. Real compatibility includes friction, disagreement, and the discovery that this person is genuinely different from you in ways that require negotiation.
Red Flags When Dating Through the Lens of Attachment
Here’s where it gets personal. Your attachment style doesn’t just influence how you behave in relationships. It determines which red flags you’re blind to.
I want to be clear about something. I’m not talking about attachment styles the way Instagram talks about them (as fixed personality types you can diagnose from a distance). In my clinical framework, attachment behaviors always emerge in relation to a specific other. How you attach is not who you are in isolation. It’s who you become when love is on the line.
That said, your childhood survival strategies create consistent patterns in what you notice and what you filter out. Understanding those patterns is one of the most important things you can do before entering a new relationship.
If You Tend Toward Anxious Attachment
You grew up in an environment where love was inconsistent. Sometimes your caregivers were warm and available. Sometimes they weren’t. You learned that the way to maintain connection was to increase your signal: be louder, more expressive, more emotionally intense. Pursue closeness aggressively because if you relax, it might disappear.
The red flags you ignore: You overlook emotional unavailability because intermittent reinforcement is your comfort zone. A partner who runs hot and cold feels familiar, even exciting. You interpret their distance as something you can fix with enough love, enough patience, enough of yourself. You dismiss controlling behavior because at least it means they’re paying attention. You accept breadcrumbing (inconsistent, minimal contact) because some attention is better than none, and the unpredictability activates the same reward pathways your childhood wired into you.
The red flags you over-detect: You’re hypersensitive to signs of abandonment, which means you sometimes see red flags that aren’t there. A partner who takes a few hours to text back triggers a threat response. Someone who needs space after a long day feels like rejection. You may push away genuinely secure partners because their steadiness feels boring compared to the neurochemical rollercoaster you’re accustomed to.
If You Tend Toward Avoidant Attachment
You grew up in an environment where emotional needs were met with discomfort, dismissal, or overwhelm. You learned that the way to maintain safety was to decrease your signal: be self-sufficient, don’t need too much, keep your emotional world private. Independence became your armor.
The red flags you ignore: You overlook a partner’s inability to be emotionally present because you’re not asking for emotional presence in the first place. You miss signs that someone is emotionally shallow or disconnected because that dynamic feels comfortable. You fail to notice when a partner is subtly controlling because they frame it as “giving you space” (which is exactly what you think you want). You dismiss a partner’s lack of investment as healthy independence rather than what it often is: emotional unavailability that matches your own.
The red flags you over-detect: You’re hypersensitive to signs of engulfment. A partner who wants to spend a lot of time together triggers your threat response. Someone who expresses strong emotions feels overwhelming rather than connected. You may interpret normal relationship expectations (regular communication, shared plans, emotional check-ins) as “clingy” or “needy” when they’re actually just healthy.
If You Tend Toward Disorganized Attachment
You grew up in an environment where the people who were supposed to provide safety were also the source of fear. Love and danger got wired together. You learned that connection is simultaneously essential and terrifying.
The red flags you ignore: You overlook the most dangerous patterns because chaos feels like home. A partner who oscillates between adoration and rage feels strangely normal. You may dismiss early signs of emotional or even physical aggression because your nervous system has been calibrated to tolerate a level of threat that would send others running. You ignore boundary violations because your boundaries were never respected as a child, so you never developed a clear internal alarm for when they’re being crossed.
The red flags you over-detect: Everything can feel like a red flag. Stability feels suspicious. Kindness feels like a trap. You may sabotage genuinely healthy connections because the absence of drama registers as the absence of love.
A Clinical Framework for Evaluating a New Partner
So if the Representative is hiding the real person, if limerence is chemically impairing your judgment, and if your attachment style is filtering which warnings reach your conscious awareness, what are you supposed to do?
Here’s the framework I use with my clients. It’s not about spotting individual red flags. It’s about evaluating patterns over time, in context.
1. Watch What Happens Under Stress
The real test is what happens when the bond feels threatened. Not how they behave on a great date. Not how they show up when everything is easy. What happens when you disagree? What happens when you’re not available? What happens when they don’t get what they want?
You don’t need to manufacture conflict. Life will provide it. But pay attention to the first few times things get hard. Do they get curious or do they get defensive? Do they take responsibility or do they blame? Do they repair or do they pretend it didn’t happen?
2. Pay Attention to How They Handle “No”
This is one of the most underrated early assessments. How does this person respond when you set a boundary? When you say you’re not available tonight? When you don’t want to do what they want to do? When you express a preference that conflicts with theirs?
A person who respects boundaries will adjust without punishing you. They won’t guilt-trip, sulk, or make you feel like you’ve done something wrong by having needs of your own. A person who struggles with boundaries will make you pay a price for every “no,” even if the price is subtle (a change in tone, a period of silence, an offhand comment designed to make you second-guess yourself).
This test is especially revealing because the Representative is programmed to be accommodating. When someone can’t maintain the accommodation even during the early, limerence-fueled phase, that’s significant. It means the underlying pattern is strong enough to override even their best efforts at impression management.
3. Observe How They Treat the “Unimportant” People
How someone treats waitstaff, customer service representatives, their own family members, people who can do nothing for them. This is the most reliable preview of how they’ll eventually treat you, once the Representative retires and you’ve become someone they no longer need to impress.
4. Track Consistency Over Time
Red flags when dating are rarely single events. They’re patterns. Anyone can have a bad day, say something insensitive, or react poorly to stress. What matters is whether these moments form a trend or remain exceptions.
Give yourself a minimum of six months before making any major commitment (moving in together, merging finances, getting engaged). This isn’t pessimism. It’s giving reality enough time to emerge from behind the Representative.
5. Notice How You Feel in Your Body
Your nervous system is often smarter than your conscious mind. If you consistently feel anxious, on edge, or like you’re walking on eggshells around a new partner, that’s data. If you feel like you need to shrink yourself, monitor your words, or manage their emotions, that’s data.
A relationship that is genuinely safe should make your nervous system calm down over time, not ramp up. If three months in you’re more anxious than when you started, that’s not passion. That’s your body telling you something your limerence-soaked brain doesn’t want to hear.
6. Check Your Rationalizations
One of the most useful exercises I give clients is this: write down the things about your partner that bother you. Then write down the story you’re telling yourself about why those things are okay.
“They yelled at me, but they were really stressed at work.”
“They went through my phone, but they’ve been cheated on before.”
“They don’t want me seeing my friends as much, but it’s because they love spending time with me.”
Now read those rationalizations as if your best friend were saying them to you. What would you tell them?
If you find yourself constantly building a case for why concerning behavior is acceptable, you’re not being understanding. You’re being your own defense attorney, and your client is the relationship, not yourself.
7. Evaluate Their Relationship With Accountability
This might be the single most important thing to assess. Does this person have the capacity to say, “I was wrong. I’m sorry. I’ll do it differently”? And do they follow through?
People who cannot take accountability will eventually make you responsible for every problem in the relationship. Every fight will become your fault. Every hurt feeling will be something you caused. And over time, you’ll start to believe them.
The ability to own mistakes, hold yourself accountable, and change behavior is the foundation of a healthy relationship. No amount of chemistry, attraction, or shared interests can compensate for its absence.
The Red Flags That Actually Matter (and the Ones That Don’t)
After sixteen years of clinical work, I’ve found that the red flags when dating that actually predict long-term relationship failure are rarely the ones that make viral content. They’re subtler, quieter, and much harder to detect through the haze of limerence.
Red Flags That Predict Real Trouble
Contempt. Not anger, not frustration, but contempt. The eye roll. The dismissive tone. The sense that they believe they’re better than you. Contempt is the single strongest predictor of relationship failure, and when it shows up early, it rarely improves.
Inability to tolerate your separateness. A partner who needs you to share all their opinions, enjoy all their interests, and abandon your own identity is not showing love. They’re showing a need for fusion that will eventually suffocate you.
Pattern of broken repairs. They apologize, but nothing changes. They acknowledge a problem, but the same behavior repeats. Apologies without behavioral change are not accountability. They’re pressure release valves designed to reset your tolerance.
Covert control. Not obvious demands, but subtle manipulation of your choices, your social circle, your self-perception. “I just worry about you when you go out with those friends.” “Are you really going to wear that?” “I’m not controlling, I just love you so much I can’t stand the thought of losing you.” These statements sound like care. They’re not.
Your own escalating accommodation. This one is about you, not them. If you notice that you’re gradually becoming smaller, quieter, less yourself, that’s the most important red flag of all. Healthy love should make you more yourself, not less.
Things That Aren’t Red Flags (Even Though the Internet Says They Are)
They need time alone. This is not rejection. This is a human being with an inner life.
They don’t text you constantly. Constant texting in early dating is not connection. It’s anxiety management.
They have a close relationship with an ex. This can actually be a positive sign. It suggests they’re capable of maintaining bonds even when the romantic component ends.
They express disagreement. A partner who never pushes back is not easygoing. They’re hiding.
They don’t say “I love you” quickly. Saying “I love you” within weeks is not a sign of deep feeling. It’s often a sign of limerence or anxious attachment. A person who waits until they’re certain is showing you that their words carry weight.
Stop Looking for Red Flags. Start Paying Attention to the System.
I want to leave you with something that might reframe this entire conversation.
The pop psychology approach to dating tells you to scan your partner for individual defects, as if you’re a quality control inspector and they’re a product rolling off the assembly line. Find the flaw, reject the unit, try the next one.
This approach has two problems. First, it ignores the fact that attachment behaviors always emerge in relation to a specific other. Your partner’s behavior is not a fixed trait. It’s a response to the system the two of you are co-creating. The same person who shuts down with you might be completely open with someone else, not because they’re manipulative, but because different attachment pairings activate different survival strategies.
Second, it lets you off the hook. If you’re always scanning your partner for red flags, you never have to ask the harder question: what am I bringing to this dynamic? What red flags am I presenting? What parts of myself is my own Representative keeping hidden?
The most useful thing you can do when dating is not to become better at detecting your partner’s flaws. It’s to become more aware of your own patterns. Understand your attachment style. Know which red flags you’re biologically wired to ignore. Recognize when limerence is running your decision-making.
Because the truth is, the biggest red flag in any relationship is a lack of self-awareness. And that applies to you just as much as it applies to the person sitting across from you at dinner.
I’ve watched couples transform when both partners commit to understanding their own wiring. I’ve also watched relationships collapse when one or both partners refuse to look inward and instead spend all their energy cataloging the other person’s deficiencies. The difference between these two outcomes rarely comes down to compatibility. It comes down to willingness. Willingness to be honest about who you are, how you got this way, and what you’re going to do about it.
That’s the real work of dating. Not finding a perfect person. Finding a person who is willing to do the work alongside you, and being willing to do it yourself.
If you’re ready to understand your own patterns (not just your partner’s), that’s where real change begins. Not in another listicle. Not in another TikTok diagnosis. In the honest, uncomfortable work of understanding who you become when love is on the line.
Figs is a licensed marriage and family therapist with 16+ years of experience working with couples. He’s the co-founder of Empathi, host of the “Come Here to Me” podcast, and author of an upcoming book on relationships and the systems that shape how we love.
Explore More Topics
Keep Reading
Every couple has a pattern they cannot see. Find yours.
In love, each of you is a Relentless or a Reluctant, which makes you one of three kinds of couple: Relentless and Reluctant, two Relentless, or two Reluctant. The free quiz reveals your creatures and the cycle they fall into together. About three minutes.
No signup needed to start.
The Relentless
The Reluctant
