When a couple sits on my couch and one person is ready to walk away, I have to deliver a very specific diagnosis. You are stuck in the Waltz of Pain, and the music has simply gotten so loud that one of you is desperate to leave the dance floor [1, 2]. I explain that their relationship is not failing because they are incompatible, but because they are caught in a perfectly designed feedback loop created by two nervous systems trying to stay safe [3].
In the Empathi framework, we see that one of you is the emotional pursuer, what we call the Relentless Lover [4, 5]. When the connection feels threatened, you protest by demanding closeness because you are terrified of being abandoned [5]. The other is the emotional withdrawer, the Reluctant Lover [5, 6]. You retreat to protect yourself because you are terrified of being a disappointment and failing the person you love [5, 7].
Mainstream relationship advice tells couples to communicate better, to sit down and have a heart to heart, and to explicitly ask for what they need [8, 9]. I tell my clients to ignore that advice entirely. When you are the pursuer, you desperately try to reach your partner to stop the pain of disconnection [10]. You send long text messages, you initiate deep conversations, or you write a well reasoned letter detailing exactly how you are hurting [11, 12]. You think you are carrying a can of water to put out the fire of your conflict [13, 14]. But that can is mislabeled, and it is actually full of gasoline [13, 14].
Every time you say “can we talk” or outline your unmet needs, your partner does not hear an invitation for intimacy. They hear that they are failing you yet again [15]. Your attempt to pull them closer lands as criticism, causing them to withdraw even further [16, 17]. The harder you reach, the harder they retreat [18]. You step forward, they step back, and the cycle accelerates [19].
As my wife Teale and I often discuss on our podcast Come Here To Me, the parts of your brain that have learned communication skills are simply not online when you are disconnected from your primary partner [20, 21]. You cannot solve a limbic system crisis with a perfectly articulated list of grievances [21, 22].
The way out is not a better argument or a more detailed letter. The way out is stepping back and recognizing that you are both hurting and both scaring the living daylights out of each other precisely because you mean so much to one another [23, 24]. Only by dropping the communication hacks and acknowledging the shared system can you begin the actual proof of work required for relational repair [25].
The Biology Behind Their I Want a Divorce
Which pattern is running your relationship?
Take the free three minute quiz and meet the creature behind the cycle you keep getting stuck in.
In these sources, the author frequently explains the biology behind an emotional withdrawer asking for a divorce [1]. In the therapy room, the author clarifies that this declaration is rarely a clean, cognitive decision. Instead, it is the result of a nervous system that has decided exile is safer than presence.
The author maps this dynamic using the Compass of Shame, explaining that when a person feels like a constant disappointment, their biology registers an existential threat [2]. The withdrawer is not acting out of coldness, malice, or a lack of care [3]. Their body has simply run the numbers and concluded that enduring another year of feeling like a failure in their partner’s eyes is far worse than the chaos of leaving [4, 5]. The author illustrates this urge to flee using the metaphor of the Alaska Man, a heartbroken protector part that convinces the withdrawer they should pack a bag, move away, and disappear so they can never disappoint their family again [6]. The pain of feeling unworthy is so severe that the withdrawer will do anything to escape it [5]. They are protecting themselves from a systemic pattern that feels completely unsurvivable.
To help couples understand this biological response, the author relies on the framework of the two separate suffering bubbles [7]. In a moment of relationship crisis, the emotional pursuer, or the Protester, sits in their own bubble of feeling abandoned, unloved, and panicked [7]. Meanwhile, the withdrawer sits in an isolated bubble, convinced that they are powerless and will never be enough [7]. Because the Protester is so consumed by their own fear of abandonment, they often misinterpret the withdrawer’s exit as a cruel rejection [8].
The clinical intervention requires breaking down this tragic misunderstanding. The author insists that the Protester must recognize the sheer terror hiding underneath their partner’s withdrawal. The author explains to the pursuing partner that the withdrawer shuts down and leaves not because they do not care, but because they are devastated inside when they realize they are a disappointment to the person they love the most [9]. The withdrawer’s retreat is a frantic, biological attempt to survive the shame of failing their primary attachment figure [3].
When the Protester actually hears this reframe and witnesses the vulnerability beneath the exit strategy, it completely changes the next conversation. The author observes that if the pursuing partner can see the withdrawer as a frightened human being rather than a cold adversary, the entire emotional field of the room shifts [10]. By recognizing that both partners are hurting deeply because they mean so much to each other, the couple can merge their isolated pain into one shared suffering bubble [7]. In this body of work, relational repair only becomes possible when both people stop treating each other as the enemy and finally acknowledge the biological panic driving their disconnection [11].
Stop Doing These Things Today
In the sources, the author provides a specific list of behaviors that individuals must stop doing immediately when caught in a high conflict relationship or facing a separation. When a relationship reaches this level of distress, the instinct is to try and fix the problem through intense communication, but the author warns that these attempts almost always make the situation worse [1].
First, stop initiating deep heart to heart conversations. The author explains that when the attachment system feels threatened, the parts of the brain responsible for reflection, empathy, and communication are simply not online [2]. Expecting beautiful or productive behavior during a state of nervous system threat is foolish [2]. You cannot solve a limbic system problem with a cognitive conversation [3].
Second, stop sending long texts of explanation or well reasoned letters. The author observes that a partner might write a letter to explain their pain, hoping to finally be seen and understood [4]. However, without emotional safety, these explanations inevitably land on the partner as criticism and attack [5]. Writing messages that point out how the other person is failing is a primary way to keep the negative system going [6].
Third, stop bringing up the marriage and trying to negotiate your way out of the pain. The author clarifies that true conflict resolution is not about reaching an agreement, finding a compromise, or getting on the same page [7]. That is merely negotiation, which completely bypasses the emotional experience [7]. Trying to rationally problem solve a fundamental emotional bonding issue will only create more frustration and deepen the disconnection [8].
Finally, stop the dignity shedding moves of pleading, begging, threatening, and listing their faults. The author notes that when people feel their connection is at risk, they often protest by blaming, criticizing, pointing out what the other person did wrong, or making demands [9]. While these reactions make logical sense to the person experiencing the pain of disconnection, they are highly destructive to the bond [10].
The author is clear about why these actions must stop. You might believe you are carrying a can of water to put out the fire in your relationship, but that can is actually filled with gasoline [1, 11]. Every time you throw these behaviors at your partner, you are throwing gasoline on the fire of your disconnection [11].
Each of these actions confirms to your partner’s nervous system that they are under threat [12]. If your partner is an emotional withdrawer, your pursuit and criticism signal to their body that they are a constant disappointment and will never be enough [13, 14]. Instead of drawing them closer, your protests confirm their worst fears and convince their biology that pulling away or leaving is the only safe option [14, 15].
Not chasing, not collapsing, doing the actual work instead
Figlet is the AI relationship coach I built and trained on twenty years of doing this exact work with couples on the brink. It will not tell you what you want to hear. It will help you stop doing the things that are making it worse and start doing the things that actually have a chance.
What to Do Instead
Once you stop throwing gasoline on the fire of your disconnection, what do you actually do? You start with Empathy for Me [1, 2]. This is hard and immediate work. You cannot do the relational work of saving your marriage without first refusing to abandon yourself. Most people trapped in the Waltz of Pain judge their own panic [3, 4]. They think their protests are pathological or that they are simply too much. But there is a little kid inside of you who is terrified of being abandoned, and your biological reaction makes perfect sense [5, 6]. You must turn toward your own vulnerability and comfort that hurting part of yourself instead of turning away in shame [7, 8].
Next, you practice Empathy for Them. This is an absolute discipline, not a fleeting feeling [2]. You must recognize that your partner’s decision to withdraw or ask for a divorce makes complete sense from inside their nervous system, even if they are entirely wrong about the underlying problem [9, 10]. Their body has simply run the numbers and concluded that another year of feeling like a constant disappointment in your eyes is unsurvivable [10, 11]. They are protecting themselves from a pattern that feels overwhelming [12]. You must respect the reality of their pain and step out of your own subjective experience to see the terror hiding underneath their exit strategy [9, 13].
Then, and only then, can you offer small acts of presence that do not demand a response. When you are no longer operating from a frantic need to be reassured, you can stop demanding that they fix your pain [14]. You offer witnessed repair. These are small, repeated, undemanding moments where you show up differently [15, 16]. You drop the criticism, you stop the pleading, and you simply stay present and regulated [17]. You look at the pain your cycle caused and you validate it without asking for immediate forgiveness or closeness in return [18, 19].
This is the Sovereign Us work [20, 21]. You are showing them, through your consistently changed behavior, that the negative loop you were both trapped in is not the only dance you know how to do [22, 23]. I have worked with couples who were already legally divorced, lived in separate states, and were told by previous therapists that there was absolutely no hope [24]. They reconciled and eventually remarried because they stopped fighting each other and started fighting the negative cycle [24, 25]. They proved through undeniable behavioral evidence over time that they could safely return to a compassionate baseline [26]. They built a new system where both people could finally breathe, feel seen, and be safe [27].
I have to be completely honest with you about where this leads. Sometimes doing this grueling proof of work saves the marriage, and sometimes it does not [28, 29]. You might do all of this emotional labor and your partner might still choose to walk away. But the goal of reflexive participation is not to manipulate another person into staying. If you do this work to understand your system, regulate your nervous system, and build your own internal stability, the outcome stops destroying you [30, 31]. Either way, you escape the cycle. Either way, you become a profoundly solid human being. You become a person worth being with [31, 32].
Not chasing, not collapsing, doing the actual work instead
Figlet is the AI relationship coach I built and trained on twenty years of doing this exact work with couples on the brink. It will not tell you what you want to hear. It will help you stop doing the things that are making it worse and start doing the things that actually have a chance.
Keep Reading
Every couple has a pattern they cannot see. Find yours.
In love, each of you is a Relentless or a Reluctant, which makes you one of three kinds of couple: Relentless and Reluctant, two Relentless, or two Reluctant. The free quiz reveals your creatures and the cycle they fall into together. About three minutes.
No signup needed to start.
The Relentless
The Reluctant
