Why Your Fights Keep Going in Circles
Here is something I see every week in my practice: a couple walks in, sits down, and within five minutes they are locked into the same argument they have been having for years. Different topic, same emotional architecture. She says he never listens. He says she is never satisfied. Both of them are telling the truth. And both of them are completely missing the point.
The reason your fights feel circular is not because you married the wrong person. It is because you are both defending against something you do not want to feel. And the framework that explains this most precisely, the one I keep returning to after sixteen years of clinical work, is called the triangle of conflict.
This article is going to walk you through what the triangle of conflict actually is, how it operates inside your relationship, and (most importantly) what you can do about it. If you have ever felt stuck in your relationship, this is likely the reason why.
What Is the Triangle of Conflict?
The triangle of conflict is a psychodynamic model developed by David Malan that maps the internal process behind human emotional responses. It has three points:
- Hidden feeling (the core emotion): The genuine, vulnerable emotion underneath the surface. Grief. Longing. Fear of abandonment. Shame. These are the emotions your nervous system considers dangerous.
- Anxiety (the signal): The physiological alarm that fires when the hidden feeling starts to surface. Your chest tightens, your stomach drops, your breath gets shallow. This is your body saying, “Warning: vulnerability ahead.”
- Defense (the protective action): The strategy you deploy to avoid feeling the hidden emotion. Withdrawal. Intellectualization. Sarcasm. Rage. People-pleasing. These are not character flaws. They are survival strategies.
The triangle works like this: a hidden feeling begins to emerge, anxiety signals that the feeling is dangerous, and a defense kicks in to suppress or redirect the feeling before you have to experience it fully. This entire sequence can happen in less than a second. Most people go through their entire lives without ever becoming aware of it.
Malan originally developed this model for individual psychotherapy, but I want to make the case that its most powerful application is in couples work. Because when two people build a life together, they do not just bring their love. They bring their triangles.
The Hidden Feeling: What You Are Actually Fighting About
Let me tell you about a couple I worked with. I will call them Marcus and Leah.
Marcus and Leah came to therapy because of what Leah described as “communication problems.” They fought about dishes, bedtimes, screen time for the kids, how often they visited her parents. The content changed. The temperature never did.
When we slowed it down, here is what we found underneath.
Marcus grew up in a household where his emotional needs were treated as inconvenient. He learned early that needing things from other people was dangerous. The hidden feeling at the base of his triangle was a deep, aching longing to be enough, saturated in shame. He did not consciously know this. He just knew that when Leah criticized how he loaded the dishwasher, something inside him collapsed.
Leah grew up in a household where her father was emotionally absent. She spent her childhood trying to earn his attention and consistently failing. The hidden feeling at the base of her triangle was a primal fear of abandonment, the terror that the person she loves most will simply stop caring.
Neither of them was fighting about dishes. Marcus was fighting against the feeling that he was fundamentally inadequate. Leah was fighting against the feeling that she was about to be left alone. The dishes were just the surface.
Common Hidden Feelings in Couples
In my clinical experience, the hidden feelings that drive most couple conflicts cluster around a few themes:
- Shame: “I am not enough. Something is fundamentally wrong with me.”
- Fear of abandonment: “I will be left. I am not a priority.”
- Fear of engulfment: “I will lose myself. My needs will disappear.”
- Grief: “I have already lost something I cannot get back.”
- Longing: “I want to be seen, held, chosen, and I do not believe I will be.”
These are not minor emotions. These are existential. They touch the deepest parts of our attachment system, the parts that were wired in childhood and reinforced across decades. And because they are so big, the nervous system does everything in its power to keep you from feeling them directly.
That is where anxiety comes in.
Anxiety: The Alarm System Between You and the Truth
Anxiety, in the context of the triangle of conflict, is not the clinical diagnosis. It is the body’s signal that a core emotion is approaching the surface. Think of it as an alarm system. The moment your nervous system detects that you might feel something deeply vulnerable, anxiety fires.
This is the moment most couples miss entirely.
When Marcus heard Leah’s criticism, his body responded before his mind caught up. His jaw tightened. His shoulders came up. His breathing went shallow. That was anxiety doing its job, alerting his system that shame was incoming.
When Leah noticed Marcus pulling away (even slightly, even just a micro-expression of disconnection), her heart rate spiked. Her hands got cold. Her thoughts started racing. That was anxiety alerting her system that abandonment was incoming.
Here is the critical point: anxiety is not the problem. Anxiety is information. It is telling you exactly what is at stake emotionally. But because anxiety is deeply uncomfortable, most people treat it as the enemy rather than the messenger. They want to get rid of the anxiety rather than listen to what it is pointing toward.
What Anxiety Looks Like in the Body During Conflict
In session, I often ask couples to track their physical sensations during a disagreement. Here is what typically shows up:
- Chest tightness or a “sinking” feeling in the stomach
- Shallow breathing or holding the breath entirely
- Jaw clenching, fist clenching, muscle tension in the shoulders
- A sudden feeling of heat or cold
- The mind going blank or racing with counterarguments
- An overwhelming urge to leave the room, change the subject, or “fix it” immediately
Every one of these is the anxiety point of the triangle doing its work. And every one of these is the precursor to a defense.
Not sure where you stand?
Take the free Figs Quiz. 13 questions. Discover your relationship pattern in under 3 minutes.
Defense: The Strategy That Protects You and Destroys Your Relationship
This is where the triangle of conflict becomes devastatingly relevant to couples. Because the defense, the thing you do to avoid the hidden feeling, is almost always the thing that triggers your partner’s hidden feeling. It is a closed loop. A self-reinforcing system. What I call, borrowing from the framework I use in my practice, the Waltz of Pain.
The waltz has three steps that repeat endlessly: a negative perception of the other, a reactive emotion, a protective action. Your protective action becomes your partner’s negative perception, which triggers their reactive emotion, which triggers their protective action, which becomes your negative perception. Around and around you go.
Let me break down the most common defenses I see in couples and how each one functions within the triangle.
Withdrawal: The Defense That Looks Like Indifference
The hidden feeling underneath withdrawal is almost always shame or a deep fear of disappointment. The person who withdraws is not indifferent. They are overwhelmed. Their nervous system has concluded that engagement is dangerous, that anything they say or do will confirm their inadequacy. So the defense kicks in: shutdown, collapse, silence.
This is Marcus. When Leah criticized him, his system collapsed inward. He went quiet. He left the room. He stared at his phone. From the outside, it looked like he did not care. From the inside, he was drowning in a feeling of powerlessness so intense that his nervous system chose dissociation over engagement.
The cruel irony is that withdrawal is the single most activating behavior for a partner with abandonment fears. Marcus’s defense against shame directly triggered Leah’s deepest terror. He was trying to survive. She experienced it as proof that she did not matter.
Intellectualization: The Defense That Hides Behind Reason
Some people do not withdraw into silence. They withdraw into logic. They build rational arguments. They explain. They present evidence. They speak in a measured, calm tone that sounds reasonable to anyone observing from the outside.
This is one of the most sophisticated defenses I encounter, and one of the most difficult to work with, because the person deploying it genuinely believes they are being helpful. They think the problem is that their partner does not understand the facts. If they could just explain clearly enough, the conflict would resolve.
But here is what is actually happening inside the triangle: a core emotion (usually shame or fear of inadequacy) triggers anxiety, and the defense that emerges is a retreat into the cognitive. The person becomes, as I describe it in my clinical framework, “dysregulated in a language that professionals recognize as competence.” They sound composed. They are falling apart.
The partner on the receiving end of intellectualization almost always feels dismissed. They are reaching for emotional connection and hitting a wall of logic. It is like trying to hug someone wearing a suit of armor. The armor is not aggression. It is protection. But it makes intimacy impossible.
Anger as Defense: The Strategy That Mistakes Volume for Safety
Anger is perhaps the most misunderstood emotion in couples therapy. Most people think of anger as the problem. It is usually the defense.
The hidden feeling underneath defensive anger is almost always fear of abandonment, fear of not being a priority, or a deep sense of being unseen. The person who gets loud, critical, blaming, or demanding is not doing so because they are mean. They are doing so because their nervous system has decided that the only way to prevent abandonment is to escalate.
This is Leah. When she sensed Marcus pulling away, her system did not shut down. It ramped up. She became critical, disappointed, demanding. She picked apart his choices, his tone, his effort. To Marcus, she looked like an aggressive litigator building a case against him. To Leah’s nervous system, stopping felt like accepting abandonment. The volume was not cruelty. It was desperation.
Here is what makes anger-as-defense so destructive in couples: it is the defense most likely to confirm your partner’s worst fear. Leah’s escalation confirmed Marcus’s belief that he was inadequate. His withdrawal confirmed her belief that she was going to be left. Two people, both terrified, both defending, both making it worse.
People-Pleasing: The Defense That Sacrifices the Self
This one often flies under the radar because it does not look like a defense. It looks like kindness. Accommodation. Flexibility. The person who people-pleases in a relationship agrees to things they do not want. They absorb blame that is not theirs. They say “it is fine” when it is not fine. They avoid conflict at all costs because conflict activates a shame so deep that their nervous system chooses self-erasure over confrontation.
In the triangle of conflict, the hidden feeling is often a belief that “I am the problem” or “I deserve this.” The anxiety signals that asserting a need or a boundary will result in rejection or punishment. The defense is compliance, accommodation, disappearing into the other person’s preferences.
The relationship cost is enormous, even if it takes years to become visible. The people-pleaser builds resentment underneath their compliance. Their partner never learns who they actually are because they are only ever shown an edited, agreeable version. And when the resentment finally erupts (and it always does), the partner is blindsided. “Where is this coming from? You never said anything was wrong.”
That is the point. The defense was designed to make sure they never said anything was wrong. And now the relationship is paying the price.
Why the Triangle of Conflict Is a Couple Problem, Not an Individual Problem
Here is what makes the triangle of conflict so important for couples to understand: your triangle does not exist in isolation. It interlocks with your partner’s triangle. Your defense triggers their hidden feeling. Their defense triggers yours. You are not two individuals with separate emotional problems. You are a system.
This is why individual insight, on its own, is rarely enough to change a relationship pattern. Marcus can understand intellectually that he withdraws because of shame. But understanding does not stop the withdrawal in the moment when Leah’s tone shifts and his amygdala fires. Leah can understand that her criticism comes from fear. But understanding does not stop her from escalating when Marcus goes quiet and her abandonment alarm starts screaming.
The triangle of conflict explains why couples can read every relationship book, listen to every podcast, know exactly what they are “supposed” to do, and still end up in the same fight on a Tuesday night. Knowledge lives in the prefrontal cortex. The triangle operates in the limbic system. They are different neighborhoods. And when the limbic system is activated, the prefrontal cortex goes offline.
The Defended Self Wants Confirmation, Not Resolution
This is perhaps the most important thing I can tell you about the triangle of conflict in relationships: when you are operating from your defense, you are not actually trying to resolve the conflict. You are trying to confirm your worldview.
The defended self wants to be right more than it wants to be close. Marcus’s defended self wants to confirm that engagement is dangerous, that withdrawal is justified. Leah’s defended self wants to confirm that she is being abandoned, that her anger is warranted. Both of them are building a case, collecting evidence, and interpreting every ambiguous signal through the lens of their deepest fear.
This is not a character flaw. This is neurobiology. The brain is a prediction machine, and when the amygdala is activated, it starts filtering all incoming information through a threat lens. Your partner’s neutral expression becomes evidence of indifference. Their reasonable request becomes proof of your inadequacy. The triangle of conflict does not just shape how you respond. It shapes what you perceive.
Breaking the Triangle: What Actually Works
If you have read this far and recognized your own triangle (or your partner’s), the question becomes: what do you do about it? I want to be honest with you. This is hard work. But it is possible work. And it starts with three shifts.
Shift 1: Name the Defense in Real Time
The first step is developing the ability to catch yourself in the act. Not after the fight. Not the next morning. In the moment. This requires building what I call “triangular awareness,” the capacity to observe yourself moving from hidden feeling to anxiety to defense while it is happening.
This sounds simple. It is not. When your nervous system is activated, self-observation is the last thing it wants you to do. But with practice (and often with the support of a skilled therapist), you can begin to create a tiny gap between the anxiety and the defense. A pause. A moment of choice.
In that pause, you might say to yourself: “I notice I am about to go silent. What am I protecting myself from?” Or: “I notice I am building a logical argument. What feeling am I trying not to have?” The naming does not make the feeling go away. But it interrupts the automaticity of the defense.
Shift 2: Speak From the Hidden Feeling, Not the Defense
This is where the triangle of conflict becomes transformative for couples. When you can bypass the defense and speak directly from the vulnerable feeling underneath, something remarkable happens: your partner’s defensive system often stands down.
In my practice, I describe this as the moment “the defended self steps aside and the real experience is spoken.” When that happens, the loop breaks.
For Marcus, this sounded like: “When you pointed out what I did wrong with the dishwasher, I felt like I failed again. And that feeling is so heavy that I just want to disappear. I am not ignoring you. I am drowning.”
For Leah, this sounded like: “When you went quiet, I felt terrified. Like you were already gone. And the only way I know how to fight that feeling is to get louder, because at least then I know you can still hear me.”
Notice what happened. The content did not change. The dishwasher is still loaded incorrectly. But the emotional register shifted from defense to vulnerability. And vulnerability, unlike defense, invites connection rather than escalation.
Shift 3: Understand Your Partner’s Triangle as Well as Your Own
One of the most powerful exercises I do with couples is mapping both triangles side by side. When you can see that your partner’s defense is not an attack on you but a protection against their own hidden feeling, everything changes. Not overnight. Not without struggle. But fundamentally.
Marcus learning that Leah’s criticism was actually fear of abandonment wearing a disguise did not make the criticism feel good. But it gave him a different place to respond from. Instead of hearing “you are inadequate” (which activated his triangle), he could begin to hear “I am scared you are leaving” (which activated his compassion).
Leah learning that Marcus’s withdrawal was actually shame wearing a disguise did not make the silence less painful. But she could begin to understand that his departure from the room was not departure from the relationship.
This is what I mean when I say the triangle of conflict is a couple problem. The solution is not one person fixing their triangle. It is both people understanding the system they have built together and choosing, deliberately and repeatedly, to respond from vulnerability rather than defense.
The Triangle of Conflict and the Nervous System
I want to add one more layer to this discussion, because it matters clinically and it matters for your daily experience of your relationship.
The triangle of conflict is not just a psychological model. It is a neurobiological one. When the hidden feeling is activated, the amygdala fires instantly, deploying a survival response before the thinking brain has any say in the matter. This is why you cannot “think” your way out of your defense in the heat of conflict. The defense is not a thought. It is a biological event.
This has enormous implications for how we approach couples therapy. It means that insight alone (knowing your pattern) is necessary but not sufficient. You also need to build new neural pathways, and that requires repeated experiences of doing something different when the triangle activates. Not just understanding the defense, but practicing a different response, over and over, until the new pathway becomes as automatic as the old one.
This is why I am skeptical of approaches that treat couples therapy as primarily a communication exercise. Teaching couples to use “I statements” or “active listening” is fine as far as it goes, but it does not go far enough. If you do not address the triangle of conflict, the hidden feeling that drives the anxiety that triggers the defense, you are teaching people better scripts for the same play. The dialogue improves. The emotional architecture stays the same.
When to Seek Professional Help
I believe deeply in self-education. The fact that you are reading a 4,000-word article about the triangle of conflict tells me you are serious about understanding your relationship at a deeper level. That matters.
But I also want to be transparent: some triangles are deeply entrenched. If you and your partner have been locked in your defensive cycle for years, if your fights consistently escalate to contempt or stonewalling, if one or both of you has started to lose hope, self-education alone may not be enough. A skilled couples therapist can do something that no article or podcast can do. They can slow the triangle down in real time, helping you catch the defense as it activates and guiding you back to the hidden feeling while your partner is sitting right there, witnessing it.
That witnessing is where the healing happens. Not in the understanding. In the experience of being vulnerable in front of the person you love and discovering that the catastrophe your nervous system predicted does not actually occur.
The Triangle Is Not the Enemy
I want to close with something that might seem counterintuitive. The triangle of conflict is not something to be eliminated. Your defenses exist for a reason. They kept you safe during a time in your life when you genuinely needed protection. The child who learned to withdraw was protecting himself from unbearable shame. The child who learned to escalate was fighting against an abandonment that was real. The child who learned to comply was surviving in an environment where authenticity was punished.
The work is not to destroy your defenses. It is to develop a different relationship with them. To recognize them as outdated survival strategies that were brilliant adaptations to a childhood environment but are now creating the very outcomes you most fear in your adult relationship.
When you withdraw to avoid shame, you create the disconnection that makes your partner critical, which generates more shame. When you escalate to prevent abandonment, you create the overwhelm that makes your partner withdraw, which looks like abandonment. When you comply to avoid rejection, you lose yourself so completely that your partner cannot find you, which generates the exact isolation you were trying to prevent.
The triangle of conflict reveals a painful truth: the thing you do to protect yourself is the thing that is hurting your relationship. And the feeling you are most afraid to show your partner is the one that would bring them closest to you.
That is the work. It is uncomfortable. It requires courage. And after sixteen years of doing this work with couples, I can tell you without hesitation: it is worth it.
Figs is a licensed marriage and family therapist with 16+ years of experience working with couples. He’s the co-founder of Empathi, host of the “Come Here to Me” podcast, and author of an upcoming book on relationships and the systems that shape how we love.
Explore More Topics





