If you’ve ever Googled how to be more empathetic, you probably found some version of “listen more” or “put yourself in someone else’s shoes.” And while those aren’t wrong, they’re incomplete. Dangerously incomplete, actually. Because the version of empathy most people are taught, the version floating around in pop psychology and corporate training seminars, only covers about one-third of what empathy actually requires.
I’ve been working with couples for over 16 years as a licensed marriage and family therapist. In that time, I’ve watched hundreds of people try to “be more empathetic” toward their partner, only to burn out, feel resentful, or wonder why their relationship still isn’t working. The problem isn’t effort. The problem is that we’ve been taught a flat, one-dimensional version of empathy, and we’re trying to solve three-dimensional problems with it.
In this article, I’m going to walk you through a framework I call Empathy Cubed (Empathy3), along with a practical method called RAVE that you can use starting today. This isn’t theory for its own sake. This is the clinical architecture I use with real couples, in real sessions, when the relationship is on the line.
Why Most People Get Empathy Wrong
Here’s what most people believe about empathy: it means understanding the other person. Feeling what they feel. Seeing their perspective.
That’s empathy in one direction. And one-directional empathy is exhausting. If every time there’s conflict, one partner is supposed to cross over and hold the other person’s pain, what happens to their own? It gets swallowed. Buried. And eventually, it explodes.
I see this pattern constantly in my practice. One partner becomes the “empathic one,” always accommodating, always holding space. The other partner becomes the “difficult one,” always needing to be understood. Both are stuck in roles. Neither is actually experiencing empathy in the way that heals.
Understanding is neutral. Insight is neutral. Empathy alone, in that one-directional sense, does not create transformation. What creates transformation is something much more dimensional.
How to Be More Empathetic: The Empathy Cubed Framework
Empathy Cubed is a dimensional shift. It moves beyond the flat, one-direction version of empathy where one partner holds the other. It even moves beyond what I’d call “empathy squared,” where both partners can see each other’s fear. The real breakthrough happens when three axes of compassion come online at the same time:
- Empathy for Me (self-empathy)
- Empathy for You (other-empathy)
- Empathy for Us (system-empathy)
Three nervous systems being held. Me. You. The system between us.
Let me break each one down.
Empathy for Me: The Forgotten Dimension
Self-empathy is the piece that almost everyone skips. We’re so conditioned to think of empathy as an outward act, something you give to someone else, that we forget it starts inside. If you can’t hold compassion for your own experience during a conflict, you have nothing to offer your partner. You’re running on fumes.
Self-empathy sounds like: “I’m hurting right now. That’s real. I don’t need to fix it or explain it away. I can just acknowledge that this moment is painful for me.”
This isn’t selfishness. This is the foundation. You can’t build a bridge to someone else if you’re standing on quicksand.
In my clinical work, I often see people who are highly empathic toward others but brutal toward themselves. They dismiss their own feelings. They tell themselves to “get over it.” They hold space for everyone but themselves. And then they wonder why they feel hollow, resentful, or numb. Self-empathy is the antidote to that pattern.
Empathy for You: The Familiar Dimension
This is the version most people recognize. It’s the capacity to attune to your partner’s inner world, to hear what they’re really saying underneath the words, to feel the fear or hurt driving their behavior.
But here’s the critical nuance: empathy for your partner is not agreement. This is where people get stuck. They think, “If I empathize with my partner’s experience, I’m saying they’re right and I’m wrong.” That’s not what empathy means. You don’t have to agree with someone’s interpretation of events to accept that their experience is real for their nervous system.
Your partner can feel abandoned even if you didn’t intend to abandon them. Both of those things can be true simultaneously. Empathy is the ability to hold that complexity without collapsing into defensiveness or surrender.
Empathy for Us: The Missing Dimension
This is where Empathy Cubed becomes truly distinctive. Most frameworks stop at the dyad: me and you. But there’s a third entity in every relationship, the relationship itself. The “us.”
Think of it this way: when you and your partner fight, there’s your pain, there’s their pain, and there’s the damage to the connection between you. That connection is alive. It’s a system. And it deserves its own compassion.
Empathy for “us” sounds like: “We’re both hurting right now. And our relationship is hurting too. The thing we’ve built together is bruised. We both contributed to that, and we can both tend to it.”
When the system itself becomes an object of compassion, tended to with tenderness, that’s when repair becomes possible. The relationship stops being the battlefield and starts being the patient. Both partners shift from adversaries to co-healers. That dimensional shift literally up-levels a human being, transitioning them from a two-dimensional way of relating to a three-dimensional one.
Not sure where you stand?
Take the free Figs Quiz. 13 questions. Discover your relationship pattern in under 3 minutes.
The RAVE Method: How to Practice Empathy in Real Time
Frameworks are useful, but they don’t tell you what to do when your partner just said something that made your stomach drop. For that, you need a practical method. I teach my clients the RAVE method: Reflect, Accept, Validate, Explore.
Here’s how it works in a real moment of disconnection.
R: Reflect
Mirror back what you’re hearing. Not your interpretation. Not your rebuttal. Just what they said, in its simplest form.
“You felt alone and overloaded.”
That’s it. You’re not solving anything. You’re not defending yourself. You’re simply proving that their signal got through. In a world where most people feel chronically unseen, reflection is a profound act. It says, “I received you.”
The temptation at this stage is to add a “but.” (“You felt alone and overloaded, but I was also dealing with…”) Resist that temptation. The “but” erases everything before it. Just reflect. Full stop.
A: Accept
Acceptance means acknowledging that their experience is real for them right now. Not necessarily accurate. Not necessarily fair. But real.
“That is true for you right now.”
This is where people panic. They think acceptance means admitting fault. It doesn’t. It means you’re recognizing that your partner’s nervous system is responding to something real, something that’s happening inside them, regardless of your intent. Acceptance is the opposite of gasighting. It’s saying, “Your internal experience is valid, even if I see this differently.”
V: Validate
Validation goes one step further than acceptance. It says, “Not only do I accept your experience, but it makes sense to me.”
“That makes sense to me.”
Again, this is not the same as agreement. You can validate someone’s reaction without agreeing with their conclusion. “It makes sense that you felt abandoned when I didn’t call. You’ve told me that radio silence is a trigger for you.” You’re validating the emotional logic, not the factual narrative.
Validation is one of the most powerful tools in relational repair. When someone feels truly validated (not placated, not managed, but genuinely understood), their nervous system calms. The fight-or-flight response dials down. And suddenly, conversation becomes possible again.
E: Explore
Only after you’ve reflected, accepted, and validated do you move to exploration. This is where curiosity enters.
“What would help right now?”
This is not problem-solving. It’s an invitation. You’re not jumping to fix, advise, or propose a plan. You’re asking your partner to tell you what they actually need in this moment. Sometimes the answer is “I just needed you to hear me.” Sometimes it’s “Can you hold me?” Sometimes it’s “I need ten minutes alone.” The point is: you asked. You didn’t assume.
The RAVE method must come before any attempt to solve the problem. This is the part most people get backwards. They jump to solutions, explanations, or apologies before the other person has even felt heard. And then they’re confused when the apology doesn’t land. Of course it doesn’t land. There’s no foundation under it.
Crossing the Bridge: Why Empathy Requires Movement
One of the most important things to understand about empathy is that it’s not a state. It’s a movement. It’s something you do, not something you are. And it requires actual effort, actual willingness to leave the comfort of your own perspective and move toward someone else’s.
I use a lot of analogies in my practice, and one that resonates with couples more than almost anything else is the idea of the empathic bridge.
After a fight, each partner retreats to their own side of the river. They’re both hurting. They’re both in their own “suffering bubble.” The goal of repair isn’t to make someone wrong or to prove who started it. The goal is to bring those two separate suffering bubbles together into one shared experience.
But here’s the thing: it’s very tempting to try and step directly from the bank you’re standing on to the far bank. To leap across the entire river in one move. “I’m sorry, okay? Can we move on?” That’s a leap. And it usually doesn’t work, because it skips all the stones in between.
Instead, you have to cross stone by stone. The first stone is recognizing, “It’s both of us.” The next stone is, “We’re both hurting.” Then, “We’re both hurting each other.” Then, “We can feel empathy for ourselves and the other person at the same time.” Each stone is a small act of empathy. And eventually, you reach the island in the middle, the shared ground where both experiences are held.
This is what learning how to be more empathetic actually looks like in practice. It’s not a single dramatic gesture. It’s a sequence of small, courageous moves toward the center.
Empathy Is Not Agreement (and Why That Matters)
I need to spend a moment on this because it’s the single biggest obstacle I see in my couples work. People confuse empathy with agreement, and then they resist empathy because they’re afraid it means surrendering their own perspective.
It doesn’t. You can fully empathize with your partner’s experience of a situation and still have a completely different interpretation of what happened. Both can coexist. Sovereignty, your right to your own perspective, is not threatened by empathy. In fact, real empathy requires sovereignty. You have to be standing on solid ground within yourself (that’s the self-empathy piece) to genuinely reach across to someone else.
When I tell couples “empathy is not agreement,” I can see the relief physically move through their bodies. The shoulders drop. The jaw unclenches. Because they’ve been holding empathy hostage, refusing to extend it because they thought it meant conceding. Once they realize they can hold their own truth and their partner’s truth simultaneously, everything shifts.
This is the paradox at the heart of relational empathy: the more securely you hold your own ground, the more freely you can enter your partner’s world. The less threatened you feel, the more available you become. Self-empathy isn’t in competition with other-empathy. It’s the prerequisite for it.
How to Be More Empathetic: Practical Exercises
Theory is necessary but insufficient. If you want to develop empathy as a lived skill, not just an intellectual concept, you need to practice. And like any skill, you need to practice in low-stakes situations before the high-stakes ones arrive.
I tell my clients to think of it like a scrimmage before game day. You wouldn’t show up to a championship match having never practiced. But that’s exactly what most couples do with empathy: they only attempt it during the worst fights, when emotions are maxed out and nervous systems are flooded. No wonder it fails.
Exercise 1: The Daily Empathy Check-In (5 Minutes)
Once a day, sit with your partner for five minutes. Each person takes two minutes to share something from their day, anything mildly stressful or emotional. The listener uses RAVE: reflect what they heard, accept it, validate it, and explore what the speaker needs. Then switch.
The content doesn’t need to be about the relationship. That’s the point. You’re building the empathy muscle on neutral territory (scrimmaging on a Wednesday) so you’re ready when you actually hurt each other (game day on a Sunday).
Exercise 2: The Self-Empathy Pause
Before responding in any conflict, pause and do a 10-second internal check-in: “What am I feeling right now? Not what I think. Not what I want to say. What is my body experiencing?” Name the feeling. Just to yourself. “I feel scared. I feel dismissed. I feel overwhelmed.”
This is the Empathy for Me practice in action. It takes ten seconds, and it changes the entire trajectory of the conversation that follows. You respond from awareness instead of reactivity.
Exercise 3: The “Us” Acknowledgment
During or after a disagreement, try saying some version of: “This is hard for both of us. Our relationship is taking a hit right now, and I want to take care of that.” You’re naming the third entity, the “us.” You’re shifting from adversaries to allies, and you’re inviting your partner to do the same.
This single sentence can defuse more conflicts than any argument you’ll ever win. Because it reframes the fight: it’s no longer me versus you. It’s both of us versus the cycle that keeps trapping us.
Exercise 4: The Apology Reframe
Most apologies are cherries looking for a cake. People want to say “I’m sorry” and have it be done. But “sorry” without the empathic experience underneath it is just a word. It’s the cherry on top of the sundae. The main meal, the real nutrition, is the empathic experience itself.
So before you apologize, RAVE first. Reflect what your partner experienced. Accept it. Validate it. Explore what they need. Then, if an apology feels right, it comes from a place of genuine understanding rather than obligation. That’s an apology that lands.
Why Empathy Feels So Hard (and What to Do About It)
Let me be honest about something. When I teach people how to be more empathetic, I’m asking them to do one of the hardest things a human being can do: hold two competing realities at the same time while their nervous system is screaming that they’re under attack. That’s not a small ask.
If you’re reading this and thinking, “This all sounds great, but in the moment I can’t do any of it,” you’re not alone. Empathy is neurologically expensive. It requires your prefrontal cortex (the rational, attuned part of your brain) to override your amygdala (the threat-detection center that wants to fight, flee, or freeze). When you’re in conflict with someone you love, your nervous system treats it like a survival threat. Empathy becomes physiologically difficult.
This is why practice matters so much. You’re literally building neural pathways that make empathy more accessible under stress. Each time you practice RAVE in a low-stakes moment, you’re laying down a track that your brain can follow when the stakes are high. It’s not about willpower. It’s about wiring.
This is also why self-empathy comes first in the Empathy Cubed framework. When you can regulate your own nervous system (acknowledge your own pain, hold your own fear), you free up the neurological bandwidth to attune to your partner. If you skip self-empathy and go straight to other-empathy, you’re trying to run the most demanding software on a system that’s already overloaded.
How to Be More Empathetic in Your Relationship: A Clinical Perspective
After 16 years of sitting with couples in crisis, I can tell you that the couples who make it are not the ones who fight less. They’re the ones who repair better. And repair is, at its core, an empathic act.
The research backs this up. John Gottman’s work at the University of Washington found that the difference between “masters” and “disasters” of relationships wasn’t the absence of conflict. It was the ability to turn toward each other during and after conflict. That turning toward is empathy in motion.
Sue Johnson’s Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) framework, which deeply informs my clinical work, is built on the premise that underneath every complaint is an attachment need, and underneath every withdrawal is a fear. Learning how to be more empathetic means learning to hear the need beneath the complaint and the fear beneath the withdrawal. It means responding to what’s really happening, not just what’s being said.
The Empathy Cubed framework and the RAVE method aren’t theoretical abstractions. They’re the tools I use in session, every week, with couples who are doing the hardest work of their lives. And I’ve watched these tools transform relationships that both partners had given up on.
The Empathy Paradox: Holding Your Ground While Reaching Across
There’s one more thing I want to name, because it’s the thing that makes empathy genuinely transformative rather than just performative.
Real empathy contains a paradox. You have to hold your own experience with complete compassion while simultaneously holding your partner’s experience with complete compassion. You have to be fully in your own shoes and fully in theirs. That’s what “crossing the bridge” means. You don’t abandon your side of the river. You extend yourself to the middle.
When both partners do this, when both bring their full selves to the island in the center, something remarkable happens. The problem doesn’t disappear. But it transforms. It goes from being an obstacle between two adversaries to being a challenge faced by two allies. The relationship shifts from a war zone to a partnership.
This is what people mean when they say how to be more empathetic changed their relationship. They don’t mean they became doormats. They don’t mean they stopped having opinions. They mean they learned to fight differently: to fight the cycle instead of each other, to hold three dimensions of compassion instead of one, and to cross the bridge stone by stone instead of trying to leap.
What Empathy Actually Sounds Like in a Session
I want to give you a glimpse of what this looks like in practice, because I think it helps to see the contrast between the old way and the new way.
Old way: Partner A says, “You never listen to me.” Partner B responds, “That’s not true. I listen all the time. Just last week I…” And they’re off to the races. Two lawyers presenting their cases. Nobody is being heard. Nobody is empathizing. Both are defending.
New way (using Empathy Cubed and RAVE): Partner A says, “You never listen to me.” Partner B pauses. Does a self-empathy check: “I feel attacked right now, and my chest is tight. That’s real. I’m going to hold that.” Then RAVE kicks in. Reflect: “You’re feeling unheard.” Accept: “That’s real for you.” Validate: “It makes sense that you’d feel frustrated if you don’t feel listened to.” Explore: “What would listening look like for you right now? What do you need from me?”
Notice what happened. Partner B didn’t abandon their own experience (self-empathy). They didn’t agree that they “never listen” (empathy is not agreement). They attuned to Partner A’s pain (other-empathy). And by keeping the conversation from escalating, they protected the relationship itself (system-empathy). That’s all three dimensions, live and in real time.
Does this happen perfectly every time? Of course not. But the couples who practice this, who build the muscle over weeks and months, find that they can access it more and more readily. The neural pathways get stronger. The pause before reactivity gets longer. The bridge gets easier to cross.
Where to Start
If you take one thing from this article, let it be this: empathy is not a personality trait you either have or don’t. It’s a skill. It’s a practice. And it has dimensions that most people never learn about.
Start with self-empathy. Just notice what you’re feeling in your body during your next moment of tension. Name it. Hold it without judgment. That’s the first stone.
Then try RAVE with your partner on something small. A mildly stressful day at work. A frustration with the kids. A minor logistical disagreement. Practice the four steps: Reflect, Accept, Validate, Explore. Get the reps in before the stakes go up.
And remember: empathy is not agreement. You can hold your partner’s reality and your own at the same time. That’s not weakness. That’s the most sophisticated form of strength there is.
Learning how to be more empathetic is not about becoming softer. It’s about becoming more dimensionally skilled at love. And that’s a skill worth building.
Related reading: How to Develop Emotional Intelligence in Your Relationship | Vulnerability in Relationships | Emotional Availability in Relationships
Figs is a licensed marriage and family therapist with 16+ years of experience working with couples. He’s the co-founder of Empathi, host of the “Come Here to Me” podcast, and author of an upcoming book on relationships and the systems that shape how we love.
